Month: July 2025

The NHL released its 2025-26 season schedule Wednesday morning. Here are some key dates Utah Mammoth fans should circle on their calendars.

Season opener: Oct. 9 @ Colorado Avalanche

There’s potential for a bitter rivalry between the Mammoth and their closest divisional opponents, the Colorado Avalanche. Fans won’t have to wait long this year to see that action. They also play each other in Salt Lake City on Oct. 21.

Advertisement

It’s also Colorado’s home opener. Utah played in four home openers last year and finished with a 3-0-1 record.

Utah’s opening week consists of two additional road games against Central Division opponents before their own home opener: Oct. 11 at Nashville and Oct. 13 in Chicago.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Note to readers • The following is an excerpt from the Salt Lake Tribune’s Open Lands newsletter, a twice-a-month newsletter about Utah’s land, water and air from the environment team. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on and news we’re following, sign up to have Open Lands delivered to your inbox.

Sen. Mike Lee’s public lands sell-off rider, meant to be part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” is officially dead.

But if we look to history as our guide, Utah’s political leadership will likely be back with a new strategy and some new legal maneuver to gain control over at least some of its 35 million acres owned and managed by the federal government.

To get an idea of how the past informs the present, and how it might inform Utah’s future strategies, we spoke to Sara Dant, a professor emeritus and author of the book, Losing Eden: An Environmental History of the American West.

“If we look historically, of course,” Dant said, “this isn’t a new effort.”

It might come as a surprise, but the state’s Mormon pioneer settlers took a collectivist approach to land management, seeing it as a communal resource for all, kind of like our current perspective on federal lands managed by agencies like the U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management.

That all changed in the 1970s, when Western states with lots of public land retaliated against new federal policies that protected it from overuse.

“It was a recognition that the pendulum had swung too far toward the economy,” Dant said, “at the expense of environmental degradation.”

States’ priorities remained focused on their economies, however. Utah’s former Sen. Orrin Hatch became a prominent leader of the Sagebrush Rebellion that ensued, falsely claiming the states actually owned the lands within their boundaries and the federal government needed to return them.

The sentiment flared up in the West again in the 2010s, when legislatures in Utah, Idaho, Nevada and Wyoming drafted bills demanding the federal government hand its lands over to state control. In Utah, that included Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, managed by the National Park Service, and wildlife management areas. Utah even commissioned a study that found the state could only afford the $250 million-plus annual price tag of managing federal lands and suppressing fires if it exploited vast oil and gas resources, and even then, only if prices for those materials held steady.

In recent years, however, we’ve seen Utah shift its tone and strategy, going after smaller chunks of public lands instead of the entire federal estate. The “unappropriated lands” lawsuit it filed last year went after 18.5 million BLM acres. Utah claims the federal government is sitting on this “undesignated land” and should sell it. But it also appears a tacit admission that federal lands, including national forests, parks and monuments, do, indeed, rightfully belong to the United States, not Utah.

Then came the provisions introduced to the Congressional budget by Utah’s Rep. Celeste Maloy and Sen. Lee. They attempted to make the federal government relinquish even smaller tracts by pointing to the West’s rapid growth. Maloy asserted the federal government needed to sell off certain parcels to benefit water infrastructure near St. George. Lee ultimately claimed he wanted a sliver of BLM land to help build affordable housing.

But despite a Supreme Court that has proven its willingness to upend precedent, a friendly, disruptive administration in the White House and Republican control of Congress, Utah failed in all three attempts this year.

And even though the proposals significantly scaled back the amount of federal lands states have pursued over the decades, the backlash has never been stronger, and not just among liberal environmental groups – the fallout also included Lee’s conservative base.

“It’s going to be interesting to see what the political consequences of that are for Lee,” Dant said, “because he really whacked a hornet’s nest.”

Lee’s public lands selloff technically failed because of a Congressional budget reconciliation rule. And the Supreme Court only declined to hear Utah’s “unappropriated” lands case, leaving the door open for the state to argue it in district court.

But Utah’s latest failed attempts show how much public lands politics has shifted in the West. Some former anti-federal land conservative allies, like Nevada and Arizona, have turned purple. And even solidly red states, like Idaho and Montana, came out in strong opposition to Maloy’s and Lee’s plans. Even Interior Secretary Doug Burgum declined to offer support. Social media and pro-public land campaigns led by hunters and anglers almost certainly played a role.

“They’re so rare these days,” Dant said, “issues that elicit a bipartisan response.”

Ultimately, Utah has found itself alone with Wyoming in the fight to wrest lands from the feds. It’s quite the whimper compared to the thunderous roar behind the Sagebrush Rebellion half a century ago.

Correction • 10:39 a.m., July 16 This story has been updated to correct a misspelling of Rep. Maloy’s name.

Near the northwest boundary of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, thousands of acres of land surround Tabby Mountain, rising 1,000 feet above nearby towns.

And though the mountain is named for a former Ute Tribe chief and rests within the boundaries of the more than 4.5 million-acre reservation where about half of the tribe’s membership now lives, it’s among millions of acres the tribal government doesn’t control.

Instead, the state owns it.

Utah’s school trust holdings within the reservation total more than 300,000 acres, according to the state’s Trust Lands Administration. State trust lands, on and off Indian reservations, make up millions of acres across the western United States and generate revenue for public schools, universities, jails, hospitals and other public institutions through the leasing of oil and gas, grazing, rights-of-way and timber.

The Utah Trust Lands Administration made $166.3 million for public institutions in 2023 from the 3.3 million surface acres and 4.9 million mineral acres it manages across the state.

That fiscal year, the trust paid out about $107 million of its cumulative earnings, according to an annual report, and nearly all of that money went to K-12 schools – institutions serving primarily non-Indigenous people.

Tribes rarely benefit from trust lands’ revenue, even when it comes from land within the reservations they were forced onto decades ago.

Rick Williams, founder and executive director of People of the Sacred Land, said trust lands are part of “the dark side of the history of Indian people and the United States.” The Indigenous-led nonprofit has been digging into the history of Native American lands and treaty rights in Colorado.

The truth about how Native people were forced from their homelands has been out there a long time, Williams said, but people have only now started talking about it. Williams said he was “as naive as anybody else” before he began researching.

Yet even as people discuss that dark history more, he said, very little has happened to address it.

“If you know you’ve done something wrong, what are you going to do to fix it? And that has never happened with the American Indian people,” he said.

A checkerboard of land ownership

The Utes’ Uintah and Ouray Reservation lies in northeastern Utah, about 150 miles east of Salt Lake City on U.S. Highway 40.

The Utes once lived in a gathering and hunting economy, but following conflicts with members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the tribe moved to the dry Uinta Basin after signing the Treaty of Spanish Fork in 1865.

Later treaties created the Uintah and Ouray reservations for the tribe, which were later combined in what is now northeastern Utah. By 1933, the federal government had allotted 91% of the Utes’ reservation lands to white settlers, according to the Utah Division of Indian Affairs.

It is still the second-largest Indian reservation in the U.S., just behind the Navajo Nation, and covers more than 4.5 million acres.

But on closer look, the reservation is checkerboarded with multiple land claims on the reservation by individuals, corporations, and the government.

Altogether, the Ute Tribe oversees only a quarter of the reservation, according to a Grist investigation.

Data obtained through Grist’s “Misplaced Trust” investigation found that there are more than 500,000 acres of trust land within the Uintah and Ouray Reservation. A spokesperson for the Trust Lands Administration said the total is lower — about 359,000 acres, according to an emailed statement. The agency attributed the discrepancy to Grist double-counting acreage for parcels where the state owns the land and the mineral rights below it.

The state’s holdings on the reservation include 234,000 acres of full estate lands, 96,000 acres of mineral rights and 29,000 acres of surface-only ownership. Private owners and federal agencies also own large portions of the reservation.

Utes must lease land within their reservation from the state

Of the Indigenous nations in the U.S. that pay states to utilize lands within their own reservations, the Ute Tribe leases back the highest number of acres, based on Grist’s analysis.

The Ute Tribe’s cattle raising includes a lease with the state for nearly 47,000 acres of grazing inside reservation boundaries.

According to the email from the Trust Lands Administration, a grazing permit for a 640-acre plot runs around $300. Grist found that in one year, the Utes paid the state more than $25,000 to graze on school trust lands on the reservation. The Trust Lands Administration did not confirm or deny that figure when asked by The Salt Lake Tribune.

The Ute Tribe says on its website that the tribal government oversees about 1.3 million acres of federal trust land. That land differs from state trust land; the federal government holds the legal title, but the tribe has the right to use the land and receives the financial benefit. The tribe has built several businesses — including a supermarket, gas stations, a bowling alley, Uinta River Technologies and Ute Tribal Enterprises LLC — on federal trust land.

Using publicly accessible lessee information with land use records, Grist and High Country News found that four other tribes also lease nearly 11,000 acres, combined, of state school trust land on their own reservations: the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Pueblo of Laguna and Zuni Tribe.

According to state records that the outlets examined, the vast majority of these tribally leased lands are used for agriculture and grazing, while 0.1% percent of tribally leased lands are used for utilities or right of way leases.

In addition to the Utes leasing for grazing, the Navajo lease a small portion of their reservation lands in Utah from the state for rights of way related to oil and gas operations. The state owns much smaller portions of the Navajo Nation and Ute Mountain Ute Tribe’s reservations.

Cris Stainbrook, past president of the Indian Land Tenure Foundation, told Grist that for tribes, the cost of leasing state trust lands on their reservations for grazing and agriculture is likely lower than what it would cost to fight for those lands in court. But, he added, those lands never should have been taken from tribes in the first place.

Dispute could undermine efforts to buy back land

The Ute Tribe, in recent years, has been trying to buy their ancestral homelands back from the state, federal government and private owners with the money they make from their own oil and gas drilling.

But in 2024, the state made it harder to do that in some cases after the tribe tried – and failed – to buy the 28,500-acre plot surrounding and including Tabby Mountain, named for late tribal chief Tabby-To-Kwanah.

The sale fell through – even though the tribe offered the initial highest bid for the land — due to pressure from state lawmakers who wanted the Utah Department of Natural Resources to buy it at a price they were willing to pay and make the mountain a public nature preserve and hunting haven.

State lawmakers then passed HB262 and changed the rules to allow the sale or lease of 5,000 or more acres of trust lands to the DNR — without advertising. The law exempts the Tabby Mountain parcel.

Then, the tribe called the legislation “clearly” retaliatory.

Rep. Casey Snider said that wasn’t the case. Snider, a Republican, told The Tribune in a recent interview that he sponsored the bill because of the 2021 sale of the Cinnamon Creek property in his Cache County district, more than 150 miles from Tabby Mountain.

He described the sale of that 8,000-acre property as “sort of a fire alarm sale of public property” with a limited opportunity for the state to secure it. Snider said he wanted to avoid that happening again and that HB262 enables open communication between TLA and DNR.

The tribe declined to comment via an attorney who cited an ongoing lawsuit over the Tabby Mountain conflict. But tribal leadership has previously indicated concerns that the new rules will cut the tribe out.

Snider has a different concern: Keeping land that has been public open for Utahns to use whether or not they’re members of the Ute Tribe.

“I don’t think anybody is against having a conversation with the tribe. But I do think that, as a general rule, tribal acquisition does mean the exclusion of the broader public,” he said. “I understand that’s their prerogative, but tribal lands are not public lands.”

No land sales have triggered the state law since it took effect May 1, 2024, a spokesperson for the Trust Lands Administration said.

A call for ‘aggressively’ addressing grievances

Research has shown that tribal lands do better in tribal hands, according to the Project on Indigenous Governance and Development at Harvard Kennedy School.

“When Native nations make their own decisions about what development approaches to take, they consistently outperform external decision makers — on matters as diverse as governmental form, natural resource management, economic development, health care and social service provision,” it reads on the project’s home page.

But the country isn’t yet to a point where getting lands back into the hands of tribal governments to make those decisions is possible, experts said.

“It’s going to have to take the general public to get up in arms over it and say, ‘this is just morally wrong,’” Stainbrook, of the Indian Land Tenure Foundation, told Grist. “We haven’t gotten to that point where enough people are standing up and saying that.”

After Stainbrook retired late last year, the foundation recommended reaching out to Williams with People of the Sacred Land.

Williams has Oglala Lakota and Cheyenne heritage and, in addition to founding People of the Sacred Land, has been the head of the American Indian College Fund, the Student Academic Service Center and Minority Student Affairs at the University of Colorado and American Indian Upward Bound.

He said looking back on a history of wrongdoings can cause guilt, even though “nobody living today did any of these things.”

The honorable thing to do, he said, is “aggressively try to address those grievances in a way that creates opportunities in education or other areas” for the people who treaties displaced.

That includes building relationships to restore lands or developing comanagement agreements so tribes can start exercising some development rights, he said.

“Those are things that need to happen,” Williams said. “Otherwise, we will continue to be a country that denies Indian people a rightful place in their homeland.”

Editor’s note • This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.

The MLB draft wrapped up Monday night after 20 rounds and 615 picks.

Four local players were selected, including two from the University of Utah, one from Salt Lake Community College and one from BYU.

Utah’s Core Jackson was the first local player off the board, selected by the New York Yankees in the fifth round with the No. 164 pick.

Advertisement

Jackson starred at Utah for two seasons at shortstop, earning first-team all-conference selections in the Pac-12 and Big 12. He batted .364 in 2025, hitting 12 home runs, driving in 44 runs and hitting 19 doubles.

Nine rounds later, another Ute came off the board in pitcher Merit Jones, who was selected by the Minnesota Twins with the No. 419 pick.

Jones started 14 games for Utah, posting a 6.95 ERA and a 4-6 record. He struck out 58 batters during his 79 innings pitched this season for the Utes. He ended his time with Utah ranking No. 10 in career strikeouts with 175.

Pitcher Jaxon Grossman from Salt Lake Community College went 56 selections later to the Texas Rangers. Grossman, who began his career at Utah in 2023, had a 5.15 ERA over 50.2 innings pitched, with 55 strikeouts. He allowed just two home runs this season.

Advertisement

BYU pitcher Garrison Sumner rounded out Utah ties in this year’s MLB draft after being selected with pick No. 598 by the Boston Red Sox.

Sumner, who pitched at Utah in 2023 and Salt Lake Community College in 2024, had an 8.32 ERA and went 3-3 in 2025 for the Cougars. He struck out 60 batters in 61.2 innings pitched for BYU this season.

The City of Moab could see its first medical cannabis pharmacy within the next year, but it’s all up to the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food to place the dispensary where they see fit.

Rep. Jennifer Dailey-Provost, D-Salt Lake, sponsored House Bill 54 during the 2025 legislative session, which allows the department to open one new medical cannabis pharmacy in the state with one catch — it has to be in a rural county that’s considered medically underserved. Additionally, the bill requires the pharmacy to be locally owned and operated.

Moab meets the criteria.

City Manager Michael Black presented a letter of support at the City Council meeting July 8 about the possibility of opening the medical cannabis pharmacy at the old WabiSabi location on 160 East 100 South, citing “I think it’s a pretty good use, so I recommend that we approve the letter.”

The city council swiftly voted unanimously to support the letter, all agreeing that there’s a need for the pharmacy in Moab.

Dashiel Kulander, Moab local and CEO of Boojum Group, a cannabis processor and manufacturer, advocated for the measure.

Kulander has been working on getting Moab a pharmacy since 2020. In 2021, Moab was in the running but the dispensary went to Price instead.

The potential pharmacy is in its preliminary stages and the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food is scheduled to make a decision by Oct. 9.

According to the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 102,600 Utahns have active medical cannabis cards as of June with 181 being from Grand County.

Benefits to Moab

Kulander believes the economic impact to a medical cannabis pharmacy opening in Moab could be “substantial” but does not want to speculate on “exact figures on this point.”

He also believes that this will solve Moab’s access problem to medical cannabis pharmacies in the state.

The closest pharmacy to Moab is in Price, which is approximately two hours away.

Cris Wibby, nurse practitioner and qualified medical provider, agrees with Kulander that there’s an access problem in Moab.

“Currently, the patients have to get delivery from Price or get to Price, or they have to go up north or to St George,” Wibby said in an interview.

However, getting medical cannabis delivered to Moab isn’t as easy as it seems.

Wibby told The Times-Independent that Moab can only receive deliveries two times a month. If a patient can’t wait for a delivery, then the caregiver must be registered in the database to drive two hours to get the prescription.

Kulander believes that “by placing a pharmacy in Moab we are providing direct access to a state-regulated medicine without the need for patients to drive over 100 miles to the closest pharmacy or turn to more dangerous and addictive alternatives such as opioids to treat pain.”

The Department of Health and Human Services released 10 years of data on drug overdoses earlier this year. Kulander points to the 2023 spike in drug overdoses in southeastern Utah.

In 2023, there were 606 drug overdoses in the state, which was a 14.3% increase from the prior year.

Both Kulander and Wibby agree that if a pharmacy does open in Moab, then it could reduce the number of overdoses the state sees each year.

“We firmly believe that cannabis can play a significant role in harm reduction in the area as patients are able to substitute more dangerous opioids for medical cannabis options to treat their pain,” Kulander said. “Or … as a substitute for benzodiazepines for people struggling with PTSD,” Kulander said.

Wibby agrees with Kulander.

“I meet a lot of people who don’t want to take opiates and they’re not able to tolerate nerve medicines,” Wibby said. “I’ve worked in psych for so long, for PTSD, patients can often be on up to five or six medications.”

Nearly 87,900 Utahns have a medical cannabis card to treat their chronic pain with PTSD coming in second with about 6,400 Utahns treating their illness with medical cannabis.

Megan Broekemeir, The drug overdose prevention research coordinator with the Office of the Medical Examiner, said most drug overdoses are from prescription drugs, but opiates are being mixed with heroin, methamphetamine, and now fentanyl.

Kulander also believes that placing a pharmacy in Moab will offer a “safer [and] healthier alternative to the black market options that many Moab residents are currently consuming.”

“All of the products in Utah’s medical program are processed and manufactured in heavily regulated facilities, using clean and effective lab processes, and are third party tested to ensure purity and avoid harmful adulterants,” Kulander said.

How did we get here?

Medical cannabis was legalized in Utah during the 2018 midterm elections with only 52.7% of Utahns voting yes on Proposition 2. However, despite the narrow victory, lawmakers called a special legislative session to tighten restrictions on patient access and to give the state greater oversight on the matter, calling it the Utah Medical Cannabis Act.

Marijuana advocates said the law was “undoubtedly inferior” to what Utahns originally voted for, but that it’s better than nothing.

The program was then launched in 2019. Since the legalization of medical marijuana, the Legislature has seen a slew of bills attempting to expand access to patients.

Primarily, past Republican Gov. Gary Herbert signed Senate Bill 161 which made a number of changes to the state’s cannabis program. One protection Herbert added to patients is that medical cannabis patients cannot be discriminated against in family court.

The following year, Herbert signed SB121, which allowed physicians to recommend more patients for medical marijuana. The same year, Herbert also signed HB425 which lengthens the validity of medical cards and allows patients more time to renew their access.

In 2023, Utah officially decriminalized medical marijuana.

Despite the progression towards making medical cannabis more accessible, lawmakers are still fighting an uphill battle and Kulander agrees it’s “not a cakewalk.”

Dailey-Provost sponsored a similar bill to HB54. Originally HB203 would have opened 25 new medical cannabis pharmacies. However, after pushback from the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints and the conservative Utah Eagle Forum, the bill was amended to only issue two new pharmacy licenses in the state.

HB203 eventually met its demise in the Senate committee where it failed to receive a vote.

“HB54 became a watered down version of HB203, which only promulgated 2 new pharmacy licenses, one before January 2026 and another before January 2027,” Kulander said.

When asked why there is such a stigma around cannabis in the state, Wibby said “to politely say, maybe people have cultural, political and religious problems [and] they don’t keep up their knowledge, and so they still stigmatize cannabis.”

Because of that, Wibby said she’s had patients who have been “pushed aside” by prior providers.

“They’re left suffering,” Wibby said. “I’ve had people come in my office crying in tears because of their nerve medicine and they don’t really want to take opiates, that’s not even working, and so I think it’s a real problem.”

Originally from Connecticut and a Yale graduate, Wibby moved to Utah in hopes to revolutionize healthcare, but admits she’s received a lot of pushback.

“For me, it’s like a healing, compassionate thing, and then I feel like there’s nobody in support of me doing this,” Wibby said. “But I don’t care. These are my people and I protect them. This is really important for the community.”

This story was first published by The Times-Independent.

John Collins? Traded. Collin Sexton? Traded. Jordan Clarkson? Bought out.

Lauri Markkanen? It looks like the veteran forward is staying in Utah and will not be traded, Tim MacMahon reports at ESPN.

[Trading Markkanen] is not Utah’s intention, sources told ESPN. It would be too much to describe Markkanen as untouchable, but the Jazz still project the All-Star forward as a key player in their future core.

While this is what a front office says when trying to gain leverage and drive up the price tag on a potential trade, in this case, there are reasons to believe Utah means it.

For one thing, even if Markkanen bounces back to the form of his first season in Utah — when he was an All-Star and won the Most Improved Player award — it’s not going to disrupt the clear plan for next season, which is to, how should we put this, end up with excellent lottery odds. Secondly, his massive salary — his four-year, $195.9 million contract extension kicks in this season, starting at $46.4 million — makes finding a workable trade difficult. Finally, and tied to that contract, Markkanen struggled through an injury-plagued last season, averaging 19 points and 5.9 rebounds per game, but his shooting efficiency was down across the board, including 34.6% from 3-point range. Teams are going to want to see the 28-year-old regain his form.

Which is to say, the Jazz are going to wait, play Markannen with their young stars like the just-drafted Ace Bailey, Kyle Filipowski (who has looked fantastic at Summer League) and Walker Kessler, and see how things shake out. At the deadline, maybe the Jazz and another team out there will feel differently, maybe not, but for now expect Markkanen to stay in Utah. Where he has wanted to be.