Utah House Republicans want to bring higher education ‘back to the basics’

Utah News! Image is of two women hikers overlooking Bryce Canyon.

House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, speaks as the Utah House majority announces the 2025 policy priorities at a press conference at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. | Scott G …

The Utah Legislature’s 2025 general session starts in eight days, and the Utah House Republicans say they plan on changing the way the state’s colleges and universities deliver education.

House Republican leadership announced their policy priorities for the 2025 session, which starts Jan. 21, at a press conference Monday.

“Caucus members have been working on these issues all year long,” House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said. “These priorities are a reflection of the thoughts and feedback that we have heard all across the state.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Their priorities were in five main areas: education, affordability, infrastructure, safe communities and accountable government.

How the House majority will prioritize education this year

“Education is critical, even crucial, for improving lives and developing a skilled workforce and fostering innovation,” Rep. Candice B. Pierucci, R-Herriman, said.

The House Majority Caucus plans to focus on investing in career and technical education programs, reducing burdens for student teachers and parents and expanding individualized learning opportunities.

The goals for higher education include maximizing the value of education, streamlining and aligning degree programs with Utah’s workforce needs and increasing investments in technical education.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Schultz said they want to bring higher education “back to the basics” by focusing on providing educations that will give students strong opportunities in the workforce. This includes promoting degrees and certificates that will provide opportunities for economic success.

“It’s not fair or right to tell a student to come to one of our institutions and get a degree in a program that we know does not lead to a workforce outcome for them, does not give them a broad range of experience,” Rep. Karen Peterson, R-Clinton, said.

The representatives are also working on expanding the Utah Fits All Scholarship program which helped 10,000 families last year. There were 27,000 families who applied to receive the scholarship.

“In terms of funding we’ll see on the budget, of course, we’d love to see more money for customized learning for families and our students, but we’re looking at this year’s budget,” Peterson said.

House 2025 Priorities_SGW_00050.jpg

Rep. Casey Snider, R-Paradise, speaks as the Utah House majority announces the 2025 policy priorities at a press conference at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. | Scott G Winterton, Deseret News

How Utah plans to embrace nuclear power

In line with what Gov. Spencer Cox has said, Utah lawmakers say they want to increase energy production in the state.

Advertisement

Advertisement

More in U.S.

“We have to plan where we’re going to get our power from, how we’re going to keep the lights on, a plan that must include future technologies such as nuclear as we move forward,” said Rep. Casey Snider, R-Paradise.

As part of the House GOP focus on infrastructure, Schultz said there have been many conversations about nuclear power, “we want more of it.”

The lawmakers said expanding nuclear power output will help keep Utah’s energy costs among the lowest in the country.

The state government has worked with the Idaho National Lab and funded the San Rafael Center, looking at ways to utilize nuclear power.

Advertisement

Advertisement

There are other focuses to help improve infrastructure, like making sure the state isn’t limited by gridlock and that there is enough water for everything the state requires, from agriculture to the Great Salt Lake.

Potential changes coming to Utah’s elections

The House will be looking into the recent audit on Utah’s elections to see what concerns should be addressed, Schultz said, adding there are no firm plans on changes yet.

These potential changes to Utah’s elections processes are a part of the group’s focus on increasing government accountability.

Schultz also spoke about the debate on who should be running the state’s elections.

“I think that’s a fair debate to have. I personally have concerns with — again, it’s not specific to any title, any person holding this title — but the perception out there to have the lieutenant governor in charge of their own elections, I would like to see a way and move away from that,” Schultz said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

There will also be an effort to bring more transparency to Utah elections and to address the other major concerns found in the audit such as management of the state’s voter rolls.

Schultz said this is the second audit in a row that has highlighted concerns with voter rolls.

House 2025 Priorities_SGW_00638.jpg

Utah House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, speaks as the Utah House majority announces the 2025 policy priorities at a press conference at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. | Scott G Winterton, Deseret News

Utah House Republicans plan to focus on illegal immigration

House Republicans said they will also focus on preserving the safety of Utah’s communities amid an increase in challenges like gang violence and fentanyl trafficking.

Part of this focus will include “cracking down on illegal immigrants who commit crimes in the Beehive state,” said Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield.

Lisonbee emphasized that this is not about making Utah a threatening place for immigrants but rather holding people accountable for committing crimes in the state.

Advertisement

Advertisement

“Whether they’re from Colorado, from Utah or from South America, it doesn’t matter. If you’re here and you’re committing crimes, you will be held accountable,” Lisonbee said. “That is the message that we are sending this year with our legal immigration package.”

This will include focusing on dealing with problems of human and drug trafficking from cartels and other groups.

The House Majority Caucus plans to lower taxes to help increase affordability

House Republicans say they’re also focused on making Utah more affordable.

“Utah tops almost every list of successful states, no matter the metric, we’re No. 1 in private sector job growth, for entrepreneurship, for upward mobility and more,” said Peterson.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Part of this priority is a focus on lowering taxes, but it is currently unclear how big these tax cuts could be or what they will ultimately look like.

Other policies they say they’ll pursue include increasing affordable home ownership, strengthening business friendly policies and protecting taxpayer dollars.

Source: Utah News

NET Rankings update: Boise State up to No. 52 following Utah State loss

The Boise State men’s basketball team needs to pile up some victories to stay within striking distance of NCAA Tournament at-large consideration. Entering Tuesd …

The Boise State men’s basketball team needs to pile up some victories to stay within striking distance of NCAA Tournament at-large consideration.

Entering Tuesday’s 7 p.m. Mountain time home matchup with Wyoming (9-7, 2-3 Mountain West), the Broncos (12-5, 4-2) are up to No. 52 in the latest NCAA NET Rankings. Boise State has two strong wins over St. Mary’s (No. 33 in NET) and Clemson (No. 38) but is just 2-4 overall against Quad 1 and 2 teams, including last week’s heartbreaking loss to Utah State (No. 31).

Wyoming (No. 157) won’t offer much resume help in Tuesday’s Mountain West Conference showdown at ExtraMile Arena, but the Broncos do have two quality upcoming opponents on the road in New Mexico (No. 57) and Colorado State (No. 84). Boise State then returns home to take on Nevada (No. 64) to close out the month. 

If the Broncos can go 4-0 in their final four games in January, they should be back on the right side of the NCAA Tournament bubble. 

Utah State (16-1, 6-0), the MWC’s top-ranked team in the NET, and New Mexico (14-3, 6-0) sit atop the conference standings. San Diego State (10-4, 3-2), which has a victory over Boise State and losses to the Aggies and Lobos, is also strong in the NET at No. 40. 

Here is a closer look at each Mountain West member’s NCAA Tournament resume through the lens of the NET Rankings.

NET Ranking: 31

Record: 16-1, 6-0   Q1: 4-0 Q2: 3-1 Q3: 2-0 Q4: 6-0

NET Ranking: 40

Record: 10-4, 3-2   Q1: 2-3 Q2: 2-1 Q3: 1-0 Q4: 4-0

NET Ranking: 52

Record: 12-5, 4-2   Q1: 1-1 Q2: 1-3 Q3: 4-0 Q4: 5-1

NET Ranking: 57

Record: 14-3, 6-0   Q1: 1-1 Q2: 5-1 Q3: 2-1 Q4: 5-0

NET Ranking: 64

Record: 9-7, 1-4    Q1: 0-2 Q2: 2-2 Q3: 3-3 Q4: 4-0

NET Ranking: 84

Record: 10-6, 4-1   Q1: 1-1 Q2: 1-4 Q3: 3-0 Q4: 5-1

NET Ranking: 124

Record: 9-7, 3-2    Q1: 0-4 Q2: 0-3 Q3: 1-0 Q4: 8-0

NET Ranking: 157

Record: 9-7, 2-3    Q1: 0-3 Q2: 1-2 Q3: 1-2 Q4: 6-0

NET Ranking: 197

Record: 8-10, 1-5    Q1: 0-1 Q2: 0-4 Q3: 2-3 Q4: 4-2

NET Ranking: 273

Record: 4-13, 0-6   Q1: 0-3 Q2: 0-7 Q3: 0-2 Q4: 4-1

NET Ranking: 306

Record: 3-13, 0-5   Q1: 0-2 Q2: 0-2 Q3: 1-6 Q4: 2-3

MORE BOISE STATE NEWS & ANALYSIS

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Continue to follow our Boise State coverage on social media by liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter.

Source: Utah News

Supreme Court turns back Utah’s push to wrest control of public land from the federal government

Utah News! Image is of two women hikers overlooking Bryce Canyon.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday turned back a push by the state of Utah to wrest control of vast areas of public land from the federal government, marking a small victory for land conservation advocates who worry that similar efforts may escalate in a Republican-controlled Washington.

The high court refused to let the GOP-controlled state file a lawsuit seeking to bring the land and its resources under state control. The decision came in a brief order in which the court did not explain its reasoning, as is typical. It marks the latest roadblock for states in a running feud with the U.S. government over who should control huge swaths of the West and the enormous oil and gas, timber, and other resources they contain.

In the Western state known for its rugged mountains popular with skiers and red-rock vistas that draw throngs of tourists, federal agencies control almost 70% of the land. Utah argues that local control would be more responsive and allow the state access to revenue from taxes and development projects.

The complaint sought control of about half of federal land, which still amounts to an area nearly as large as South Carolina. The parcels are used for things like energy production, grazing, mining and recreation. Utah’s world-famous national parks and national monuments would have stayed in federal hands.

Monday’s decision by the high court comes as the newly Republican-controlled Congress adopted a rules package that includes language allowing lawmakers to more easily transfer or sell off public lands managed by federal agencies. The rules consider public lands to have no monetary value, meaning lawmakers will no longer need to account for lost revenue if they decide to give parcels to states or extractive industries.

While conservationists applauded the court’s rejection of what they called a land-grab lawsuit, many remained worried that the efforts will continue.

Public lands under state control could be vulnerable to privatization, degradation and oil drilling, said Steve Bloch, legal director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

“If successful, Utah’s lawsuit would result in the sale of millions of acres of public lands in red-rock country to the highest bidder, an end to America’s system of federal public lands and the dismantling of the American West as we know it,” Bloch said.

In a joint statement with Utah’s Republican legislative leaders and attorney general, Gov. Spencer Cox said he was disappointed in the court’s decision to turn away the lawsuit.

“Utah remains able and willing to challenge any BLM land management decisions that harm Utah,” state leaders said. “We are also heartened to know the incoming administration shares our commitments to the principle of ‘multiple use’ for these federal lands and is committed to working with us to improve land management. We will continue to fight to keep public lands in public hands because it is our stewardship, heritage and home.”

While lawsuits typically start in federal district courts and eventually work their way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, disputes involving states can start at the nation’s highest court if the justices agree to hear them.

Utah leaders noted that the high court did not comment on the merits of their arguments or prevent them from filing the lawsuit in a federal district court. Conservation groups say they’ll remain ready to challenge any future lawsuits.

“This lawsuit is an assault on the country’s long-standing and successful history of safeguarding valuable and vulnerable landscapes in trust for all Americans,” said Chris Hill, who leads the Conservation Lands Foundation. “And while the Supreme Court’s decision to not hear the case is a reprieve, we fully expect this small group of anti-public lands politicians to continue to waste taxpayer dollars and shop their bad ideas.”

The federal Bureau of Land Management declined to comment.

___

Schoenbaum reported from Salt Lake City.