No. 23 Utah at No. 15 BYU prediction: Odds, expert picks, team and player news, trends, and stats

It is a Top 25 matchup featuring No. 15 BYU (6-0, 3-0 Big 12) and No. 23 Utah (5-1, 2-1 Big 12) in Provo Saturday. The ramifications are more than simply bragging rights within the state of Utah. Each …

A mere 40 miles separates the schools, but the football programs at BYU and Utah are even closer than that. Their head coaches have worked together at one of the universities and they each attended and played for other university.

It is a Top 25 matchup featuring No. 15 BYU (6-0, 3-0 Big 12) and No. 23 Utah (5-1, 2-1 Big 12) in Provo Saturday. The ramifications are more than simply bragging rights within the state of Utah. Each is battling to keep pace with Cincinnati and Texas Tech atop the Big 12. Because Utah lost to Texas Tech back in Week 4, a loss to BYU this weekend eliminates them from the Big 12 Title Game and a spot at the college football playoff. A loss for BYU does not eliminate them this weekend but with games upcoming at Iowa State, at Texas Tech, and at Cincinnati still to be played, winning Saturday at home against the Utes looks to be imperative.

Lets dive into the schools on both sides of the ball and see what the schemes, the numbers, and their top players tell us.

Game Details and How to Watch No. 23 Utah at No. 15 BYU

  • Date: Saturday, October 18, 2025
  • Time: 8:00PM Eastern
  • Site: LaVell Edwards Stadium
  • City: Provo, UT
  • TV/Streaming: Fox

Game Odds for No. 23 Utah at No. 15 BYU

The latest odds as of Friday courtesy of DraftKings:

  • Moneyline: Utah Utes (-170), BYU Cougars (+142)
  • Spread: Utah -3.5 (-108)
  • Total: 49.5 points

Be sure to check out DraftKings for all the latest game odds & player props for every matchup this week on the college football schedule!

Will Ole Miss QB Chambliss stay hot vs. Georgia?

Vaughn Dalzell and Eric Froton preview a Saturday afternoon showdown between No. 5 Ole Miss and No. 9 Georgia at Sanford Stadium, debating if Rebels quarterback Trinidad Chambliss will pass for more than 245.5 yards.

Utah Utes

Head Coach: Kyle Whittingham
2025 Record: 5-1
Offense Ranking: 33
Defense Ranking: 6
Strength of Schedule: 53

The 2025 Utah Utes have surged to a 5-1 start, ranking 16th in SP+ with a Top 10 efficiency profile on both sides of the ball. Offensively, Utah thrives on sustained drives and red zone execution, ranking 5th nationally in success rate (53.4%) and 3rd in points per scoring opportunity (5.68) while allowing a sterling 1.3% pressure rate. Defensively, Morgan Scalley’s group is holding opponents to 4.68 yards per play (23rd) with a 34.8% success rate (18th) and is dominating on passing downs ranking 11th in EPA/pass. Kyle Whittingham’s veteran squad is currently sporting a very encouraging 32% chance to make the CFP according to SP+.

The Utah Utes Offense

The Utah offense has been one of the most efficient in the nation, ranking 5th nationally in overall success rate (53.4%) and 3rd in down set conversion rate (83.8%). The Utes dominate on the ground with a 55.3% rushing success rate (2nd nationally) and an elite offensive line that allows pressure on just 1.3% of dropbacks (7th) thanks in large part to their high-end NFL Draft caliber tackle duo of Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu. Quarterback play has been highly efficient thanks to Devon Dampier, who is sporting a 72.6% completion rate (7th) and 10.1 adjusted net yards per attempt, complementing a red zone attack that converts 86.2% of trips into touchdowns. Despite lacking explosive plays, Utah’s precision, balance, and elite short-yardage execution have powered one of the most consistently productive and mistake-free offenses in college football.

Utah Player to Watch on Offense: QB Devon Dampier

A seasoned dual-threat leader, Devon Dampier is completing 71.5% of his passes for 1,131 yards and 11 touchdowns while maintaining a strong 83.2 QBR. He’s been efficient through the air, averaging 9.6 yards per completion with a low 1.8% sack rate, showcasing poise and quick decision-making in the pocket. On the ground Dampier is lethal, recording 393 yards and five touchdowns on 6.34 yards per carry with a 51.6% rushing success rate. His combination of precision passing and mobility has made him the engine of the offense and a consistent chain-mover utilizing both designed runs and scramble situations.

The Utah Utes Defense

The Utah defense remains one of the nation’s most physical and disciplined units, ranking 6th nationally in Defensive SP+ and holding opponents to just 4.68 yards per play (23rd). Morgan Scalley’s group excels in situational football, limiting foes to a 34.8% success rate (18th) and allowing touchdowns on only 50% of red zone trips. The Utes generate steady disruption with a 34.5% pressure rate (34th) and 8.2% sack rate (16th), anchored by a defensive line that produces a 7.4% havoc rate, well above the national average. Combining stout run fits with Top 10 marks in opponent completion percentage (54.0%), Utah’s defense continues to set the tone for the program’s trademark toughness and efficiency.

Utah Player to Watch on Defense: Edge John Henry Daley

Defensive end John Henry Daley has been a wrecking ball for Utah, tallying 33 tackles, 12 havoc plays, and an elite 8.0 sacks through six games. His pass-rush production ranks among the best in the country, generating 22 pressures on 106 rushes for a 20.8% pressure rate and six sacks created, while also forcing two fumbles. Daley’s combination of power and burst has anchored a defensive line that thrives on disruption, with a 94.3% tackle rate and strong run-stopping consistency. His relentless motor and ability to win quickly off the edge have made him the centerpiece of Utah’s defensive identity.

BYU Cougars

Head Coach: Kalani Sitake
2025 Record: 6-0
Offense Ranking: 40
Defense Ranking: 15
Strength of Schedule: 38

The BYU Cougars are off to a 6–0 start and rank 23rd nationally in SP+, powered by a balanced offense (40th Off. SP+) and a Top 15 defense (15th Def. SP+). Offensively, BYU averages 6.6 yards per play (26th) and 3.17 points per drive (21st), blending an efficient ground game (5.9 YPC, 25th) with a combustible pass attack that gains 20+ yards on 18.8% of completions. Defensively, DC Jay Hill’s unit has been stingy, limiting opponents to just 4.23 yards per play (11th) and a 35.8% success rate (22nd) while forcing 10 turnovers. With elite defensive efficiency (11th EPA/Play) and a steady offense, Kalani Sitake’s squad has a 17% chance of winning the Big-12 and 37% chance of making the CFP.

The BYU Cougars Offense

The BYU offense is humming once again despite starting a true freshman at QB, ranking 40th in SP+ and averaging 6.62 yards per play with a 48.0% success rate (24th nationally). The Cougars’ balanced attack thrives on the ground, posting 5.9 yards per rush (25th) with a 49.8% rushing success rate, while also excelling in pass protection with just a 1.6% pressure rate allowed (20th). Through the air, BYU averages 7.8 yards per dropback and an impressive 10.6 adjusted net yards per attempt, showcasing their ability to generate explosive plays on standard downs (56.4% SD success rate, 11th). Despite a deliberate pace (29.5 seconds per play, 21st), Aaron Roderick’s offense ranks 21st in points per drive (3.17) and is handling business effectively for the 6-0 Cougars.

BYU Player to Watch on Offense: QB Bear Bachmeier

True freshman QB Bear Bachmeier has been a steady hand under center for BYU despite his lack of experience, completing 63.2% of his passes for 1,220 yards and an 8-to-3 TD-INT ratio through six starts. He’s averaging 9.4 adjusted net yards per attempt with a commendable 73.8 Total QBR, showing promise on rhythm throws and when extending plays outside structure. As a runner, Bachmeier adds a dynamic element with 315 rushing yards and 7 touchdowns, converting 48.5% of his carries successfully and generating 18.3% explosive runs despite facing pressure on over 20% of dropbacks. His balance of accuracy, mobility, and toughness under pressure has given BYU’s offense a consistent spark both through the air and on the ground.

The BYU Cougars Defense

The BYU defense profiles as a Top 15 unit nationally, ranking 15th in SP+ while holding opponents to just 4.23 yards per play (11th) and a 35.8% success rate (22nd). They excel in limiting explosive plays, allowing gains of 20+ yards on only 4.0% of snaps (11th), and are particularly strong in pass defense, giving up just 4.7 yards per dropback (13th) with a 22.1 defensive QBR (2nd nationally). Their run defense has been stout as well, surrendering 3.8 yards per carry (14th) while maintaining a 38.7% rushing success rate. Coordinated by DC Jay Hill, the Cougars’ disciplined, assignment-sound approach and opportunistic playmaking have turned them into one of college football’s most respected defensive units.

BYU Player to Watch on Defense: Edge Isaian Glasker

A versatile defender who excels in multiple phases, Isaiah Glasker has recorded 18 tackles (11 solo) with an excellent 85.7% tackle rate and 11 total havoc plays. His blend of athleticism and power shows up in the backfield, where he has tallied 6.0 tackles for loss, 2.0 sacks, and two interceptions with two pass breakups, displaying rare positional malleability for an outside linebacker. As a pass rusher, Glasker has generated 8 pressures on 38 rushes (21.1%), with 2 sacks created and a forced fumble, ranking among the team’s most efficient disruptors. His ability to impact all three phases—rush, coverage, and pursuit—has made him a cornerstone in Jay Hill’s aggressive, playmaking defensive scheme.

No. 23 Utah at No. 15 BYU team stats, betting trends

  • Utah has won its last 3 games when a road favorite
  • BYU has covered the Spread in 4 of its last 5 games as an underdog
  • The Over is 7-3 in Utah’s last 10 games

Target under when Iowa hosts struggling Penn State

Vaughn Dalzell and Eric Froton preview a Saturday night showdown between Penn State and Iowa at Kinnick Stadium, analyzing why the teams are struggling offensively and predicting the struggles will continue this weekend.

Rotoworld Best Bets

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Eric Froton (@CFFroton): Dallen Bentley OVER 36.5 receiving yards

Utah is happy to maul inferior defenses with their elite offensive line when the opportunity presents itself, which was the case last week when the Utes annihilated ASU 42-10 last week with backup QB Jeff Sims playing the entire game. Utah completed just 9 passes as they salted the game away, with Bentley reeling in 2-of-4 passes for 24 yards. However, in his previous three games, which were more competitive than their ASU evisceration, Bentley received 20 targets, catching 15 passes for 180 yards with his lowest game total being 46 yards. He and Ryan Davis are literally the only pass game options that QB Dampier who are on the field for 60%+ of the team pass snaps. Utah will not be able to bulldoze BYU’s formidable run defense that’s allowing just 3.8 YPC on the year. I expect Dallen Bentley to receive 5+ targets and clear his 36.5 Receiving Yards line, which was in the 45.5 range last week.

***

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, stadium information and weather forecasts.

Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

Best bets our model is projecting for this week’s game between No. 23 Utah and No. 15 BYU

  • Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is staying away from a play on the Moneyline.
  • Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the BYU Cougars at +3.5.
  • Total: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the over on the Game Total of 49.5.

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper)
  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports)
  • Trysta Krick (@Trysta_Krick)
  • Eric Froton (@CFFroton)

Source: Utah News

San Jose State vs Utah State Prediction: Lots of Points After Dark

It’s been rough for the Spartans, and the Aggies lost two straight, but they’re fun teams that should air it out. Here’s the San Jose State vs Utah State preview and prediction.

San Jose State was supposed to be a Mountain West player in the second season under head coach Ken Niumatalolo, and that went bye-bye right away in a stunning home loss to Central Michigan.

It hasn’t been easy, but with a win over New Mexico, the Spartans are still 1-1 in the Mountain West with winnable home games against Hawaii and Air Force up next.

Utah State has a lot to like under head coach Bronco Mendenhall. His offense is great, his defense plays like it has nine guys on the field, and it makes for a lot of fun games.

The Aggies get a tough run late with three road games in the next four dates, and they need this win to realistically stay alive for a bowl game.

San Jose State Spartans vs Utah State Aggies

Sep 20, 2024; Pullman, Washington, USA; San Jose State Spartans head coach Ken Niumatalolo looks on against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. © James Snook-Imagn Images

Sep 20, 2024; Pullman, Washington, USA; San Jose State Spartans head coach Ken Niumatalolo looks on against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. © James Snook-Imagn Images

How To Watch San Jose State vs Utah State

Friday, October 17, 2025
Game Time: 9:00 PM ET
TV: CBS Sports Network
Location: Maverik Stadium, Logan, UT

Predicting Every Remaining Game
ACC | Big Ten | Big 12 | SEC
Group of Five Teams, Pac-12, ND
@PeteFiutak

Advertisement

Why San Jose State Will Win

The offense is working.

Yeah, quarterback Walker Eget is questionable at best, and top receiver Danny Scudero is banged up, but the offense should still be okay against a rumor of a Utah State defense.

The Utah State offense is among the worst in the nation at generating third down conversions, but it’s the defense that’s the real issue, especially against the run.

It’s been able to hold up here and there, but run for over 4.5 yards per carry against this bunch, and get the win.

San Jose State’s two wins came on its two best running games of the season, but …

Oct 11, 2025; Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; Utah State Aggies head coach Bronco Mendenhall walks the field before his team takes on the Hawaii Rainbow Warriors at Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex.© Marco Garcia-Imagn Images

Oct 11, 2025; Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; Utah State Aggies head coach Bronco Mendenhall walks the field before his team takes on the Hawaii Rainbow Warriors at Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex.© Marco Garcia-Imagn Images

Why Utah State Will Win

Central Michigan went on a game-winning scoring drive in the final few minutes against the Spartans.

The San Jose State defense fails time and again in key moments. Stanford came back from down nine in the last six minutes to win 30-29. Last week, the Spartans were up 14 on Wyoming with ten minutes to play, and lost 35-28.

Utah State isn’t a well-oiled machine on offense quite yet, but it’s able to score, averaging close to 40 points per game. It will keep pushing for a full 60 minutes.

Advertisement

The last team with the ball gets the win?

The injuries to the San Jose State offense don’t help the cause.

Niumatalolo and his coaching staff know what they’re doing, but Eget was able to throw the offense out of problems at times. Both teams will get creative, but at home, Mendenhall’s offense will get on a roll late.

The Aggies are 3-0 at home, 0-3 at home – the road games were much, much harder, but you get the point – and they’ll continue the trend.

San Jose State vs Utah State Prediction, Betting Lines

Utah State 35, San Jose State 30
Line: Utah State -4, o/u: 61.5
ATS Confidence out of 5: 3.5
Must See Rating: 3

Week 8 Expert Picks
Bowl Projections | CFN Rankings
Cavalcade: The Hot Team, Nebraska & CFP?

Advertisement

Consensus Line from BetMGM, Caesars, DraftKings, and FanDuel. Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.

CFP Top 12 Projections 

Related: College Football Week 8 Expert Picks for the 16 Biggest Games

This story was originally reported by College Football News on Oct 17, 2025, where it first appeared in the College Football section. Add College Football News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Source: Utah News

Utah Supreme Court Misses On Shifting Burden Of Proof With A UPEPA Special Motion

Considers the opinion of the Utah Supreme Court in Mackey v. Krause regarding the Utah Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) and shifting burdens of proof.

A special motion filed pursuant to the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act is supposed to operate much like a motion for summary judgment. But what if the moving party (the speaker) asserts an affirmative defense?

Air Force veteran Stuart Mackey was hired as a marksmanship instructor by the Utah Military Academy (“UMA”) in 2021. The next year, 2022, an incident occurred where Mackey relieved a cadet as marksmanship team captain. The cadet then quit the team, leaving his father, Jason Krause, quite displeased.

According to Mackey’s defamation complaint, Krause began a “smear campaign” as Mackey with the goal being to remove Mackey from UMA. Krause complained to the school’s principal, and then to UMA’s superintendent, William Orris. Afterwards, Krause then allegedly attended a UMA school board meeting and spoke during the public comment portion. Krause claimed that a faculty member (not naming Mackey specifically) had acted inappropriately on eight occasions, that there would be “legal and law enforcement” action taken if things were no resolved to his satisfaction, and that the instructor had a physical altercation with a cadet.

Later, Mackey’s complaint alleged, Orris had a telephone call with Krause where Mackey was identified as the offending instructor. Krause also told Orris that Mackey had physically abused other students besides his son. These complaints allegedly caused Mackey to be placed on administrative leave pending an investigation, after which Mackey was terminated by UFA without explanation.

Even after Mackey had been fired by UMA, his complaint continues, Krause emailed Orris a file on Mackey and a timeline about Mackey’s conduct. Krause contended that Mackey was a “troubled individual” who “needs help” and suffered variously from narcissistic personality disorder, entitlement mentality, bipolar disorder and was a high risk to children.

Krause then, Mackey alleges, made a false report to the local police department which repeated Krause’s complaints about Mackey engaging in physical violence against students. But after investigating the matter, the police department closed the case against Mackey.

Meanwhile, the complaint continues, Superintendent Orris contacted the Utah Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) and passed along some of Krause’s information about Mackey. However, when DCFS investigated and interviewed the students who had allegedly been subject to Mackey’s physical abuse, they were told a quite different story than Krause had let on and thus DCFS likewise closed its investigation.

Based on Krause’s statements and conduct, Mackey sued Krause for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), abuse of process and tortious interference. In response, Krause filed a special motion for expedited relief under the Utah Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (“UPEPA”).

In resolving Krause’s UPEPA special motion, the trial court held that Krause had failed to show that the UPEPA applied to Mackey’s claims, since Krause’s statements were not part of any governmental proceeding. As for Krause’s comments at the UMA board meeting, the court held that because those comments were mad during the public comment period which did not pertain to any agenda item, they were not part of any governmental proceeding.

The trial court also ruled that, even if Mackey’s complaint fell within the scope of the UPEPA, Mackey had demonstrated sufficient evidence of each element of his claim such that the special motion should be denied. To this end, the trial court rejected Krause’s arguments to the effect that his statements were privileged because they pertained to governmental proceedings.

Krause appealed, setting up the opinion of the Utah Supreme Court in Mackey v Krause, 2025 WL 2480059 (Utah, Aug. 28, 2025), that we shall now examine.

The court first took up the issue of whether the UPEPA applied to Mackey’s causes of action. The UPEPA allows a special motion to be filed whenever a cause of action is based upon the moving party’s (speaker’s) communications in relation to a governmental proceeding or upon constitutionally-protected expression on a matter of public concern. The moving party, being Krause here, has the burden of demonstrating that the challenged cause of action is within the scope of the UPEPA. The UPEPA also requires that it must be construed broadly to protect such constitutional rights.

The trial court had determined that Krause’s statements were not about a matter of public concern. Since the UPEPA does not provide a definition of “public concern”, the trial court decided to borrow the definition from the California Court of Appeals on the phrase. California had defined “public concern” as a statement that goes beyond the mere subject of something of public interest, but must also itself “contribute to the public debate.” Using this definition, the trial court found that Krause’s comments focused entirely on Mackay and thus did not contribute to any date on an issue of public concern.

The Utah Supreme Court decided that it would be proper to borrow the definition of “public concern” from that announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in First Amendment cases. This standard is that something is a matter of public concern “when it can be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community, or when it is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public.” The Utah court also noted that the Washington Court of Appeals had similarly borrowed this definition when interpreting the same phrase under the Washington UPEPA. The approach to determine this phrase, also borrowed from the U.S. Supreme Court, is to examine the facts and circumstances surrounding the offending statement including its content, form and context.

Turning to Krause’s statements, the Utah court felt that Krause expressing his views as a parent about a teacher engaged in misconduct was on a matter of public concern. “It is not a leap of logic to conclude that the community at large would share a concern about a public-school teacher assaulting a student and the potential danger such a teacher might pose to the student body at large.” Further, Krause’s statements to the UMA principal and superintendent would likewise be statements upon a matter of public concern. Thus, the Utah trial court had erred when it concluded that these statements were not within the scope of the UPEPA’s protections.

The next issue was whether the trial court had correctly determined that Mackey could prove sufficient facts as to each element of his claims. Here, the trial court had used the same standard that would have been used on a motion for summary judgment. The Utah Supreme Court affirmed that this was the correct standard to be employed on a UPEPA special motion. This means that the plaintiff gets the benefit of inferences and all evidence is viewed in the light more favorable to the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff must show that there is at least minimal evidence supporting each element of every challenged cause of action. This is where the trial court ran into some trouble.

The Utah Supreme Court goes through each and every element of all of Mackey’s causes of action in a very workmanlike method, which will be great for Utah practitioners in the future. For our purposes, however, we will limit our discussion only to those elements that the Utah Supreme Court found fault with the trial court, which were relatively few.

One of those elements dealt with Mackey’s cause of action for defamation and the element of whether Krause’s statements were privileged or, in other words, Krause could not be held liable for those particular statements even if they were otherwise defamatory. This brought up the question of which party carries the burden of proof as to privilege. Normally, privilege is an affirmative defense to defamation, which means that the defendant (the speaker) carries the burden of proving that the privilege exists. This creates what the court called an “interesting twist” in the UPEPA context, because with a UPEPA special motion the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that he could satisfy each element of his cause of action.

The trial court had placed the burden on Krause to demonstrate his entitlement to a privilege, but the Utah Supreme Court thought that was error. Instead, Thus, the burden should have been placed on Mackey to prove the absence of any privilege by Krause or that Krause had abused the privilege. Thus, the case would be remanded back to the trial court to determine whether Mackey could prove that Krause was not entitled to the benefit of any privilege as to the defamation claim.

As to the intentional infliction of emotion distress (IIED) claim, the trial court was held to have erred because Krause’s conduct did not rise to the level of “outrageous conduct” even though the language he used in relation to Mackey was sometimes quite severe. Thus, the Utah Supreme Court reversed the trial court and dismissed Mackey’s IIED claim.

Mackey’s third claim was for abuse of process, which basically means that the defendant has perverted the legal process for some improper purpose. Mackey pointed to Krause’s inflammatory notes provided to Superintendent Orris, the police complaint which came to nothing, and the Utah DCFS complaint which came to nothing, as evidence that Krause had an ulterior motive in making these official claims. The Utah Supreme Court found, however, that such actions were also consistent with a parent who was truly concerned with the possibility that an instructor was engaged in the physical abuse of students, so the abuse of process claim was dismissed as well.

The last of Mackey’s claim was for tortious interference with his economic relationship with UMA. The trial court had ruled to the effect that there was evidence that Krause intended to get Mackey fired, and he succeeded. Since the method by which Krause allegedly interfered with the Mackey-UMA relationship was by defamation, the Utah Supreme Court held that this cause of action would either stand or fall along with Mackey’s defamation claim, which was being remanded. So the tortious interference claim ended up being remanded as well.

That concluded the opinion.

ANALYSIS

This is a very well-drafted and deeply thoughtful opinion by the Utah Supreme Court of which I don’t have any criticism. It does, however, identify a very interesting issue: Who has the burden of proving the existence or non-existence of a defense to defamation? The Utah Supreme Court determines that the burden is upon a plaintiff to prove that the moving party (the speaker) does not have such a defense. The effect is that the plaintiff has to anticipate that the movant will raise the defense or, really, every defense that the movant might assert. I’m not sure that is the correct result.

To ascent to the 41,000 ft. view of a UPEPA special motion, it is designed to basically have two parts. The first part is whether the plaintiff’s cause of action falls within the scope of the UPEPA so that the special motion can properly be brought at all. The burden of proving that the cause of action is within the UPEPA’s scope is on the moving party. That is easy enough. Once the moving party makes that showing, then we move to the second part.

The second part of a UPEPA special motion is designed to be, essentially, exactly the same as a summary judgment motion. This is why the UPEPA special motion may correctly be referred to as an “early summary judgment motion” or a “motion to dismiss on steroids”. When we were drafting the UPEPA, recalling that I was an American Bar Association advisor to the drafting committee, we basically anticipated that the burden in this second part would be exactly the same as on a summary judgment motion. There were good reasons for this, with the biggest being that a summary judgment motion does not violate a party’s constitutional right to a jury trial.

Thus, a UPEPA special motion may be viewed in two parts, but there is a three-step analysis as related in-depth in my article, The Uniform Public Expression Protection Act: The Three-Phase Analysis (Mar. 15, 2021). I’m not going to re-hash that article, but suffice it to say that the burden ends on the moving party to show that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to some essential element and thus the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, i.e., summary judgment.

That the burden ends on the moving party should normally apply where the moving party asserts an affirmative defense to defamation. This is what happens with a normal summary judgment motion and it should apply to a UPEPA special motion as well.

The Utah Supreme Court doesn’t dodge this issue, but confronts it head-on and concludes that the UPEPA motion should be treated differently than a motion for summary judgment, meaning that the plaintiff must prove the lack of an affirmative defense by the moving party. But this is where I think they go off into the weeds, since it is as if the Utah Supreme Court stops its analysis at the second stage (where the burden of proof is on the plaintiff), without continuing on to the third stage where the burden shifts back to the moving party.

Or, as applied in this case, the Utah Supreme Court ultimately held that the burden of proving the absence of an affirmative defense is on Mackey as the plaintiff, and not Krause as the moving party. But, again, this ignores the third stage of the UPEPA analysis which shifts the burden back to Krause ― including the burden of proving any affirmative defense.

The upshot is that as hard as the Utah Supreme Court tried to get this right, they failed to go on to the third stage and thus reached the wrong result. The correct result would have seen the burden shifted to Krause to prove his affirmative defense. So, at least on this particular issue, the opinion here should be considered dubious authority subject to reasonable question by other courts.

But this kind of stuff is common with new statutes. It’s just growing pains of a sort.

Source: Utah News

Utah Jazz Have Surprise Inactive vs. Portland Trail Blazers in Preseason

Williams won’t be alone on the Jazz’s sidelines, either. Fifth-overall pick Ace Bailey will sit out vs. Portland with a knee injury, second-year guard Isaiah Collier was also listed as out for his …

The Utah Jazz will be without one of their second-year players during their fourth and final game of their preseason slate.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune‘s Andy Larsen, the Jazz have downgraded wing Cody Williams to out with an illness.

It’ll be the first game that Williams has missed of Utah’s batch of preseason contests.

During his prior three preseason showings, Williams had a pair of ten-plus point performances vs. the Dallas Mavericks and San Antonio Spurs, along with averaging over 2.0 points and an assist a night, shooting a collective 37.0% from the field in the process

Oct 13, 2025; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Utah Jazz forward Cody Williams (5) drives towards the center against Dallas Maveric

Oct 13, 2025; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Utah Jazz forward Cody Williams (5) drives towards the center against Dallas Mavericks guard Jaden Hardy (1) during the second half at Delta Center. Mandatory Credit: Peter Creveling-Imagn Images / Peter Creveling-Imagn Images

A big year lies ahead for Williams– coming off a rocky rookie year where things didn’t quite play out in his favor, as he dealt with injury, was up and down between the main roster and G League, and had a few struggles on both ends of the ball.

So far into his second year, Williams showcased positive signs in the summer league, and a few flashes in the preseason. But that preseason sample size will now come to an end, as his next chance to suit up will land next week for their regular season opener.

With a designation of an illness, signs point towards Williams being ready to go once Utah’s regular season tips off.

Williams won’t be alone on the Jazz’s sidelines, either. Fifth-overall pick Ace Bailey will sit out vs. Portland with a knee injury, second-year guard Isaiah Collier was also listed as out for his fourth-straight game due to a hamstring strain, and veteran forwards Kyle Anderson and Georges Niang will miss out as well.

At the forward spots, expect to see Lauri Markkanen out on the floor for what will be his second preseason showing of the year, and will likely have guys like Svi Mykhailiuk and Taylor Hendricks see a bit of an expanded opportunity.

The Jazz are sure to be in better health for game one of 82 vs. the LA Clippers, but as for their final preseason game, things might be a bit more short-handed than usual.

Be sure to bookmark Utah Jazz On SI and follow @JazzOnSI on X to stay up-to-date on daily Utah Jazz news, interviews, breakdowns and more!

Source: Utah News

Utah mom accused of abducting her kids found in Southern California

Hermosa Beach police on Wednesday located two missing children who were allegedly kidnapped by their mother in Utah more than a week ago. Officers said the Payson City Police Department, which is …

Hermosa Beach police on Wednesday located two missing children who were allegedly kidnapped by their mother in Utah more than a week ago.

Officers said the Payson City Police Department, which is roughly 60 miles south of Salt Lake City, alerted them about the alleged abduction on Oct. 15, according to the Hermosa Beach Police Department. The two agencies shared automated license plate reader data and discovered that the mother’s vehicle had been driving around Hermosa Beach.

Police found the two kids, ages 7 and 11, and their mother living inside a car with two cats and a dog while patrolling through a neighborhood, according to Hermosa Beach PD. 

“When we learned of this case, we immediately felt the urgency and the seriousness of this matter,” said Hermosa Beach Police Chief Landon Phillips. “We cannot imagine how it must have felt for the children, their father and other family, and we empathize with how hard it must have been for them.”

Investigators said the mother had a warrant after allegedly violating a court-ordered custody agreement and taking the children out of Utah without proper permissions or notice. 

“Our department deeply values the teamwork and support demonstrated by our colleagues in Hermosa Beach,” said Payson City Police Chief Brad Bishop. “This case is a reminder of what can be accomplished when agencies work together with shared purpose and determination.”  

Source: Utah News

How to stream the Utah Jazz in 2025-26: TV schedule, blackout rules and new broadcasters

Here’s how to watch all 82 Utah Jazz games this season. Under Ryan Smith, the franchise has a different setup for regional telecasts.

Saxophones? Where we’re going, we don’t need saxophones. The Utah Jazz are their own kind of symphony — one with a 7-foot Finnish conductor and a trick-shooting black bear.

This year’s Jazz are not expected to compete atop the Western Conference. It’s a crowded playoff field, and Utah is on its own timeline for reconstruction. Supporters simply want to see direction and momentum. Lauri Markkanen is the All-Star holdover who will be watched around the trade deadline. Ace Bailey is the new face of the team, and this June’s fifth overall draft pick has already teased his shot-making potential. He’ll immediately chase Rookie of the Year honors as he feels out the pro game.

Advertisement

The NBA will look and sound different this season. Watching it will also cost more than ever before. The league has new broadcast partners (plural) for the first time since 2002. Cable network TNT is out; subscription services Prime and Peacock are in. That expands the NBA’s total reach, but it also brings new restrictions and additional apps to the weekly TV rotation.

Jazz fans should be focused on pressing issues like, “Is Bailey a franchise cornerstone?” and “What is the best John Coltrane album?” Any confusion around the viewing process itself should be cleared up by the end of this guide.

Make sure you’re following the NBA on The Athletic. Our roster includes incisive writers like Sam Amick, Fred Katz, John Hollinger and Joe Vardon. The site’s NBA podcasts are consistently fun and informative. And don’t forget to keep up with the team feed.

All times listed below are ET. All prices are updated as of October 2025.

You can watch in-market and nationally televised NBA games on Fubo (Stream Free Now). Out-of-market viewers can stream regional games with NBA League Pass.


Pay TV base

It begins, as things do, with eyeballs and an internet connection. Here are the most common options for cable, satellite and streaming:

  • Fubo
  • Hulu Live TV
  • YouTube TV
  • DirecTV’s “Choice” package
  • Dish’s “America’s Top 120+” package
  • Xfinity’s “Sports & News” TV + internet plan
  • Verizon Fios’ “More Fios” plan
  • Sling’s “Orange & Blue” plan with its “Sports Extra” add-on, or single-day access passes

Average monthly cost: $85-100.
Covers: ABC, ESPN, NBA TV, NBC and most regional sports networks.


KJZZ and Jazz+

Most NBA teams have their own regional sports network, or RSN. But under Ryan Smith’s ownership, the Jazz have shifted away from the traditional RSN model.

Once AT&T SportsNet Rocky Mountain shuttered in 2023, the franchise opted for over-the-air games on KJZZ. That means all local households with a broadcast antenna can watch regional Jazz games for free. The channel is also on select pay TV carriers. Folks without a TV setup can stream through a subscription called Jazz+, which costs $19.99 per month.

Advertisement

The telecast’s play-by-play is handled by Craig Bolerjack, an industry veteran who debuted on Jazz broadcasts 20 years ago. He’s joined by analyst Thurl Bailey, a former bespectacled Jazz big man who was drafted seventh overall in 1983. Occasionally, we’ll get feature reporting from Holly Rowe, Utah native and national fixture in ESPN programming.

For the far-away fans, out-of-market regional games are included on NBA League Pass. The only events blacked out on League Pass are prime-time national spots and in-market RSN broadcasts. League Pass has different viewing options for home and away presentations, plus an in-arena feed that shows the JumboTron misadventures instead of commercials (if you get the premium version). That means extra looks at Jazz Bear:

NBA League Pass also gives subscribers access to NBA TV, which will air 60 regular-season contests. The two Jazz games that will be broadcast on NBA TV will also be available locally on KJZZ and Jazz+.

What you’ll need to watch these games: A broadcast antenna, pay TV package or subscription to Jazz+ if you’re in the area, and NBA League Pass if you’re not.
Additional monthly cost for out-of-market fans:
$9-14 ($109.99/season on one device, $159.99/season for up to three devices).

Got it? Good. Now, let’s prepare for the main-stage action. Here’s how the national TV rotation looks this season:

  • Sunday* — ABC/ESPN and NBC/Peacock
  • Monday — Peacock
  • Tuesday — NBC/Peacock
  • Wednesday — ESPN
  • Thursday* — Prime Video
  • Friday — Prime Video and ESPN*
  • Saturday* — ABC/ESPN and Prime Video

* starts midseason


ESPN

This is the home of Mike Breen’s “bang!” call, which has punctuated basketball’s biggest moments across the 21st century. ESPN’s other play-by-play options are Ryan Ruocco, Mark Jones and Dave Pasch. In a convoluted move emblematic of the current broadcast business, “Inside the NBA” with Charles Barkley, Shaquille O’Neal, Kenny Smith and Ernie Johnson has been licensed to the Walt Disney Company. Starting this season, the Chuck-Shaq-Jet-Ernie studio show will still be produced by TNT Sports but air on ESPN and ABC.

Advertisement

Jazz games on ESPN

  • No games scheduled

ABC

The other home of Breen’s “bang,” since ABC and ESPN are intertwined under Disney. ABC games can generally feel a bit bigger and more glamorous, because they draw a bigger audience over the air and because they fall on weekends. This is also where the NBA Finals go down. Of note, the network demoted (and then extended) Doris Burke, while Tim Legler got called up to the finals team with Breen and Richard Jefferson.

Jazz games on ABC

  • No games scheduled

What you’ll need to watch ESPN/ABC games: ABC is free over the air. ESPN comes with a pay TV package, or a subscription to ESPN Unlimited ($29.99/month).


NBC

It’s the return of “Roundball Rock.” This might be the best theme music in all of sports broadcasting. It has inspired rap samples and “SNL” skits and … this remix with Kawhi Leonard’s laugh.

NBC last aired NBA games in a dozen-year stretch between 1990 and 2002. It aligned with the religious experience that was Michael Jordan’s Chicago Bulls, and it built legends around Marv Albert and Bob Costas. Mike Tirico leads the new play-by-play crew; he also does “Sunday Night Football” for the network. Other commentators for this NBC reboot include Noah Eagle, Terry Gannon and Michael Grady.

NBC has “Coast 2 Coast Tuesday” doubleheaders on TV, with prime-time tipoffs for viewers in Utah. NBC games can also be streamed on Peacock.

Jazz games on NBC

  • Tuesday, Jan. 27: vs. LA Clippers, 10 p.m.

Peacock

Like ABC, NBC gets picked up for free with a broadcast antenna (rabbit ears never went out of style). But NBCUniversal is also trying to maximize Peacock, its over-the-top subscription service already building out a presence in college football and Premier League soccer. This season’s Peacock games are on Mondays, and most weeks have two or three exclusives stacked up to start the week.

Jazz games exclusively on Peacock

  • Monday, Feb. 23: at Houston Rockets, 9:30 p.m.

What you’ll need to watch these games: NBC is free over the air. Peacock subscriptions that include live sports start at $10.99/month with ads.
Additional monthly cost: $11-17 for the Peacock exclusives.


Prime Video

It was only a matter of time, really. The Amazon live broadcast team already snapped up NFL’s “Thursday Night Football” and a round of WNBA games. Its basketball buy-in starts this fall. Ian Eagle and Kevin Harlan are two of the best, most recognizable voices in both basketball and football. They’ll do the lead play-by-play assignments, along with Eric Collins (the Charlotte Hornets guy!) and Michael Grady (he’s splitting between NBC and Prime).

Prime has the knockout rounds of this year’s NBA Cup, plus the Play-In Tournament and select playoff games. Prime users can also link their NBA League Pass to use in the app.

Source: Utah News

Opinion: What 2 decades of homelessness work have taught me about Utah’s proposals

After 20 years working with people experiencing homelessness, I can say Utah’s proposed legislative changes will repeat old mistakes.

After 20 years working with people experiencing homelessness — from running shelter programs in Seattle to supporting HUD’s Youth Homelessness Demonstration Program nationally — I’ve learned what works and what doesn’t. Utah’s proposed legislative changes concern me deeply because they repeat mistakes I’ve watched fail in cities across America.

I’m not an outside critic. My family and I chose to make Salt Lake City our home, and I’ve watched this community grapple with these challenges. What I’m seeing in the current proposals isn’t innovation — it’s a return to approaches that research and experience have shown produce worse outcomes at a higher cost.

What actually works?

In my years facilitating communities of practice on coordinated entry and training practitioners nationwide, I’ve seen a consistent pattern: People recover faster when they have stable housing first, then receive services — not the reverse.

Research published in JAMA Network Open confirms what I’ve witnessed firsthand: Housing First with intensive case management is cost-effective and produces better outcomes than treatment-first models. When people have a safe place to sleep, they show up for treatment appointments. They take their medications consistently. They can focus on recovery rather than daily survival.

I’ve facilitated trainings across the country helping communities move people into housing quickly while maintaining trauma-informed, person-centered approaches. The communities that succeed aren’t the ones with the most enforcement or the biggest institutions — they’re the ones that invest in permanent housing with supportive services.

The institutional model doesn’t work

The proposed centralized campus with involuntary commitment facilities represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what people experiencing homelessness need. Having worked extensively with both large and small communities, I can tell you that institutional congregate settings produce worse outcomes than community-based permanent housing.

Large facilities create their own problems: disease transmission, violence, lack of privacy, loss of dignity. People avoid them. And when you make them involuntary? Research shows that involuntary commitment for substance use disorder is less effective and more dangerous. People are more than twice as likely to experience fatal overdoses compared to those in voluntary treatment.

I’ve spent years working with the Youth Homelessness Demonstration Program, where we’ve proven that young people thrive when given housing, support and a voice in their own recovery — not when they’re warehoused in institutions.

What Utah should do instead

As a Salt Lake City resident and someone who has watched Utah’s homelessness increase 18% in the past year, I understand the urgency. But urgency shouldn’t lead us to expensive mistakes.

Utah needs to invest in what actually works:

Permanent supportive housing: Utah’s own data shows 95% of people placed in permanent housing stay housed. This isn’t speculation — it’s Utah’s track record when we commit to housing.

Rapid rehousing: Help people get back into housing quickly with temporary assistance. It costs far less than keeping people in shelters or jails.

Crisis response teams: Pair mental health professionals with law enforcement. I’ve seen this work in multiple cities — it reduces arrests and improves outcomes.

Youth-specific programs: Building on successful models I’ve helped implement through YHDP, invest in developmentally appropriate services for young people experiencing homelessness.

The real crisis

From 2000 to now, Salt Lake County rents have increased 140%. That’s the crisis. Research shows that every $100 increase in median rent correlates with a 9% increase in homelessness.

We can’t solve this by building more shelter beds or institutional facilities. We solve it by building affordable housing and helping people access it with supportive services.

A personal plea

I’ve devoted my career to this work because I’ve seen people transform their lives when given the right support. I’ve watched someone who had been homeless for years become a peer support specialist helping others. I’ve seen young people exit homelessness and go to college. I’ve witnessed families reunited when parents got stable housing and treatment.

These successes didn’t happen in institutions. They happened in scattered-site housing with voluntary services, trauma-informed care and people being treated with dignity.

Utah has an opportunity to lead again, as we once did with Housing First. But that requires courage to stick with evidence-based approaches even when political pressure pushes toward punishment and institutions.

The 4,600 Utahns experiencing homelessness deserve better than recycled failures. They deserve what we know works: housing, services and dignity.

Source: Utah News

Big 12 this week has ‘Holy War’ in Utah and top 2 passers on same field in longest Texas rivalry

The Big 12 has a couple of interesting rivalry games this week. No. 23 Utah plays at instate rival No. 15 BYU.

Things to watch this week in the Big 12 Conference:

Game of the week

No. 23 Utah (5-1, 2-1 Big 12) at No. 15 BYU (6-0, 3-0), Saturday, 8 p.m. ET (Fox)

The Holy War between the instate rivals about 50 miles apart is a Big 12 game for just the second time. Will Ferrin’s 44-yard field goal with 3 seconds left gave BYU a 22-21 win last year, when Utah’s debut in the Big 12 marked their first time in the same conference together since the Mountain West in 2010. This will be the first meeting with both in the Top 25 since an overtime win by BYU in 2009.

With true freshman quarterback Bear Bachmeier and Big 12 rushing leader LJ Martin (108.7 ypg), BYU is 6-0 in back-to-back seasons for the first time in school history. Dual-threat transfer quarterback Devon Dampier and the Utes are coming off a 42-10 home win over then-No. 21 Arizona State. Utah has already matched its overall and Big 12 win totals from last year.

Utah is second in the Big 12 in scoring offense (39.5 ppg) and scoring defense (13.8 ppg). BYU is third in both categories (37.5 ppg and 14.7).

The undercard

Baylor (4-2, 2-1) at TCU (4-2, 1-2), Saturday, noon ET (ESPN2)

The nation’s top two passers will be on the same field for the 121st meeting in the most-played rivalry game in the state of Texas. Baylor’s Sawyer Robertson tops the list at 343 yards passing per game and 19 TD passes. He has completed 158 of 248 passes (63.7%) for 2,058 yards, and is the only 2,000-yard passer in FBS. TCU’s Josh Hoover is 139-of-215 passing (64.7%) for 1,893 yards, ranking second with 315.5 yards per game and 18 TDs. TCU has a 59-54-7 series lead after winning eight of the last 10 meetings.

Impact players

— Houston senior tight end Tanner Koziol has multiple receptions in 18 consecutive games and his team-high 30 catches this season are the second-most for an FBS tight end. The Cougars are 5-1 for the first time since 2021.

— Linebacker Jake Golday is the Big 12’s leading tackler with 56 tackles (9.3 per game) for No. 24 Cincinnati, which takes a five-game winning streak to Oklahoma State.

— Arizona State receiver Jordyn Tyson has scored a touchdown in seven consecutive games. The latest was a 3-yard TD run after six consecutive games catching a TD pass.

Inside the numbers

West Virginia (2-4, 0-3) or UCF (3-3, 0-3) will get its first Big 12 win this season when they meet Saturday, and one of the reunited coaches will get his first win in a Big 12 game. The Mountaineers were in the Big East when Rich Rodriguez left in 2007. The Knights were in the American when Scott Frost departed after a 13-0 season in 2017. … Cincinnati’s offensive line has allowed only one sack. … Texas Tech is the first Big 12 team to win each of its first three conference games by at least 24 points since Baylor in 2015. … Arizona’s defense has eight interceptions, only one off last season’s total.

QB uncertainty

Arizona State in its Big 12 debut last season lost its first conference game 30-22 at Texas Tech, but the Sun Devils went on to win the league and make the 12-team College Football Playoff. Both teams go into a rematch Saturday with uncertainty about their starting quarterbacks. The Red Raiders are off to their best start since 2013, even with Behran Morton exiting early last week for the third time this season because of injury. Sam Leavitt missed Arizona State’s lopsided loss at Utah because of a right foot injury, but was practicing this week.

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here and here (AP News mobile app). AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football

Source: Utah News

Utah Secures Home Opener Win

SALT LAKE CITY – A dominant second period helped Utah secure a 3-1 win over the Calgary Flames in the Mammoth’s Home Opener. Forwards Barrett Hayton and JJ Peterka scored 3:08 apart in the middle …

When the Mammoth use their speed, forecheck, apply pressure, and limit time and space they’re at their best. Utah did all of that in the second period and this surge started by carrying momentum from the end of the first into the second.

Seventy-six seconds into the middle frame, Barrett Hayton’s goal tied the game, 1-1. Not only did Hayton have a quick release on his shot, Nick Schmaltz set up his linemate perfectly so he could capitalize. Minutes later, Peterka intercepted a pass, showed his speed as he rushed up ice and scored the eventual game-winning goal. The goal gave Utah its first lead of the game, 2-1 which they never relinquished.

Throughout the entire second period, the Mammoth pushed hard and brought energy. Utah’s offense had plenty of chances, 18 shots on goal in fact, while the Mammoth’s defensive effort held the Flames to just three shots in the middle frame.

As the Mammoth have done before, they kept calm under pressure and stuck with the ‘bend, not break’ mentality in the third period. Calgary pushed back with a flurry of chances in the first half of the final frame. However, key saves by Utah goaltender Karel Vejmelka, and some help from his teammates, kept the Flames from capitalizing during these pushes. With 22.2 seconds left in regulation, Kevin Stenlund’s empty net goal sealed the win. With the win, Utah improved to 2-2-0 and has started its four-game homestand with a win.

Like last year, Delta Center gave the Mammoth home-ice advantage. The energy was intense, the arena was loud, and it was the best way to welcome the team back home.

“The crowd throughout the whole game was unbelievable,” Peterka smiled. “Started with the anthem, in warmups, how many kids, how many fans came out. Throughout the whole game when we needed energy, we for sure got it from the crowd.”

“It was really loud, especially in the end of the game,” Vejmelka recounted about the energy and Vejmelka chants. “I really enjoyed the moments, I really appreciate it. It’s always pleasure to me.”

Additional Notes from Tonight:

  • Coming into tonight’s game, the Mammoth were allowing the second fewest shots on goal (21.3). In tonight’s game, Utah held Calgary to five shots in the opening frame, three in the second period, and 12 in the final frame for a total of 20 shots.
  • There’s a new Mammoth in town and his name is Tusky! Utah revealed its brand-new mascot pre-game. “I like the size,” Tourigny smiled when discussing Tusky. “I didn’t see him skate yet, so I would have to see him skate before I made the call (to play him).”
  • Things got heated throughout the game as Jack McBain and Adam Klapka dropped the gloves and there was a total of 38 penalty minutes. The Mammoth’s power play was unable to score on any of their six man-advantage opportunities; however, the team had some good looks and close chances. On the flip side, Utah went 3-for-4 on the penalty kill.
  • The Mammoth then held on to a one-goal lead for over 30 minutes to secure the team’s first win at home this season. “Just a super mature game throughout the whole bench,” Peterka said of the team’s effort defending the lead. “I think everyone (stuck with it), made the right plays at the right time. Game management was pretty good from us.”

Upcoming Schedule:

Source: Utah News