‘Every turn reveals something new’: Hiking Southern Utah’s stunning slot canyons

At first glance, the desert landscape of Southern Utah seems like a sweeping, sun-baked canvas — wide open and endless. But tucked deep within its sandstone folds are slot canyons, sculpted over …

Editor’s Note: “My Happy Place,” a CNN Original Series following celebrities on deeply personal journeys, airs Sundays at 10 p.m. ET/PT. CNN also tapped correspondents to share their happy places. Bill Weir feels a world away in Buckskin Gulch in Utah.



CNN
 — 

At first glance, the desert landscape of Southern Utah seems like a sweeping, sun-baked canvas — wide open and endless. But tucked deep within its sandstone folds are narrow slivers of magic: slot canyons, sculpted over millennia by wind and rushing water.

They draw hikers from around the world, eager to wander their labyrinthine paths and stand in awe beneath towering walls sometimes just feet apart. But as alluring as they are, these canyons demand more than admiration. They require preparation and a healthy respect for nature’s power.

“Slot canyons are fun and easy … until they’re not,” says Jim Clery, owner and guide at Utah Canyon Outdoors in Escalante, Utah. “You have to know when to say no.”

A different kind of hiking

Slot canyon hiking blends beauty, problem-solving and risk.

“It’s not just walking,” says Lura Snow, deputy operations manager for Wildland Trekking in Utah. “There’s often scrambling, navigating tight squeezes, standing water — and an otherworldly quality of light that feels like you’ve stepped into a secret place.”

Before any of that begins, there’s often a stretch of open desert hiking to reach the canyon itself. Exposed to sun and heat, these approaches can be deceivingly difficult.

“You’re not just hopping out of the car and into the canyon,” Clery notes. “Some routes require miles of walking through dry washes or sandy trails before you even get to the slot. It’s part of the journey.”

For many, slot canyons evoke a sense of awe and curiosity. “There’s a real sense of discovery,” says Clery. “Every turn reveals something new.”

Orientation and options in Buckskin Gulch

About an hour’s drive east of Kanab, Utah, Buckskin Gulch — believed by many to be the longest and deepest slot canyon in the US, and possibly the world — draws hikers with its immense scale and towering canyon walls. Stretching for approximately 16 miles through a twisting corridor of sandstone, its walls can reach heights of 300 feet while narrowing to shoulder-width in places.

There are a few ways to hike Buckskin Gulch, depending on how far you want to go. The most popular starting point is the Wire Pass Trailhead, which offers the quickest access to the narrows. From here, you have two main options.

For those up for an overnight
You can hike all the way through Buckskin Gulch to the White House Trailhead — a roughly 21-mile point-to-point trek. This route starts at Wire Pass Trailhead and travels the length of Buckskin Gulch, approximately 16 miles, before reaching its confluence with Paria Canyon.

While camping is not allowed inside Buckskin Gulch, you can set up camp once you reach Paria Canyon, where dispersed backcountry camping is allowed with a valid overnight permit. Because the trail begins and ends at two different locations, arrange a shuttle in advance to return to the starting point.

For a shorter, more accessible option
Many hikers choose an out-and-back route starting at the Wire Pass Trailhead. The trail follows a wash for about 1.7 miles before entering Buckskin Gulch, where towering walls and deepening narrows stretch for miles.

Just inside Buckskin, you’ll find petroglyphs etched into the rock — look low on the right as you enter. Most hikers continue a short way into Buckskin before turning around, making this route a rewarding and flexible way to experience the canyon’s scale and beauty without committing to the full 21-mile trek.

A hiker steps along rocks placed in a "cesspool," an obstacle known for its standing, putrid water, inside Buckskin Gulch near Kanab, Utah.

Recreation.gov advises Buckskin Gulch hikers to check weather conditions and river flow before setting out. Leave your itinerary with a reliable contact who will know who to call if your group doesn’t return on time.

If Buckskin feels intimidating, there are other places to begin.

Beginner-friendly alternatives

The Peek-A-Boo and Spooky Gulch loop near Escalante, Utah, in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is one of the most popular beginner-friendly options. This three-mile route winds through sculpted sandstone, with playful climbs, squeezes and narrow passages — but no technical gear required.

Peek-A-Boo greets you with smooth, swirling walls and natural steps, while Spooky Gulch challenges you with tight corridors where backpacks — and sometimes bodies — need to shimmy sideways to get through. The trickiest obstacle is a 12-foot climb to enter Peek-A-Boo, but solid handholds and good footing make it manageable. Because it’s a loop, you can explore both canyons without backtracking.

For those who want to ease into slot canyon hiking — or simply leave the logistics to someone else — guided trips offer an excellent alternative. Companies like Utah Canyon Outdoors and Wildland Trekking provide safety, gear, route knowledge and local insights, making it easier to focus on the experience without the stress of navigating on your own.

Flash floods and fatal mistakes

Slot canyons are carved by water — and can be flooded by it in an instant. “People hear ‘flash flood’ and think giant walls of water,” says Snow. “But even a relatively small amount can be deadly.”

The danger? Many hikers only check the weather at the trailhead. But flash floods can be triggered by storms miles away. Buckskin Gulch, for example, drains from the Paunsaugunt Plateau near Bryce Canyon over 100 miles away, meaning a storm there can send water cascading through the canyon long after skies clear near the entrance.

“Check the weather for the entire drainage,” says Snow. “Not just where you’re standing.”

A hiker at the bottom of Buckskin Gulch offers a sense of its depth.

Flash floods have caused fatalities in recent years, including two hikers who died in Buckskin Gulch in 2023.

Even experienced hikers can be caught off guard by storms miles away.

“You might have blue skies above you,” says Snow, “but if it’s raining 50 miles away, that water can still come barreling through.”

Not just water: Other hazards and surprises

Slot canyons may feel still and silent, but they’re full of surprises. Their shady, sheltered walls offer refuge for desert wildlife — from rattlesnakes and insects to the occasional tarantula.

“Slot canyons are shady places, so wildlife takes refuge there,” Snow explains. She once joked about tarantulas “raining from the sky,” but it’s usually just a spider dropping from a ledge — startling, not dangerous. (Tarantulas aren’t considered dangerous to humans; their bite is mild and rarely causes more than minor irritation.) While rare, these encounters are reminders to stay alert and tread thoughtfully.

Then there’s the terrain: narrow passages, slick rock and puddles that can be deeper than expected, sometimes even requiring a swim. Water hazards and the occasional patch of quicksand are also possible, especially after storms.

Trekking poles help with balance and testing depth, and sturdy shoes — and a sense of humor — go a long way. “Some people turn around at the first puddle,” Snow says. “But if this is your once-in-a-lifetime chance? Get in the puddle.”

Clery adds that most injuries come from people hopping off short ledges. “Even a two-foot jump can lead to a twisted ankle. If you’re wedged in a narrow canyon with a busted leg, getting out becomes a whole new problem.”

When to go — and when to turn back

Spring and late fall are generally the safest times to visit. Summer monsoon season (late July through September) can bring flash floods, especially in places like Buckskin. Even in dry months, storms can build quickly.

“Start early,” says Clery. “In summer, we’re on the trail by 6:30 a.m.. That gives us time to get in and out before the heat and storms hit.”

And if the weather — or your gut — says something feels off? “Be flexible,” he says. “Have a Plan B. Nature gets the final word.”

“Have a Plan B. Nature gets the final word,” advises one Utah guide. Slot canyon hiking requires some specific preparation.

Planning, permits and prep

A little homework goes a long way. Try to narrow down what kind of experience you’re after — short and scenic, longer and challenging, guided or solo.

Check with local Bureau of Land Management (BLM) offices, visitor centers, outdoor shops or guide services for advice and current conditions. And grab a paper map — cell service can be unreliable, and batteries die.

Permits are required for both day hikes and overnight trips in the Buckskin and Paria Canyon area, and both are available through Recreation.gov. A $6 day-use permit covers hikes like the popular Wire Pass route, while overnight trips into Paria Canyon require a separate permit, limited to 20 people per day. Spots can fill fast, so it’s smart to plan ahead.

Be sure to pack plenty of water — at least one liter per hour in summer — plus salty snacks, sun protection, a basic first-aid kit and blister care.

“Desert hiking is slow, and you need to prepare for extra time,” Clery says. “We measure canyons in hours, not miles.”

Leave no trace

The rise in slot canyon popularity has brought an uptick in damage, from graffiti on petroglyphs to improperly buried waste.

“People have carved their names over 8,000-year-old rock art,” Snow says. “It’s ignorance, not malice, but it’s heartbreaking.”

Snow urges hikers to carry wag bags for human waste, use Kula cloths (reusable antimicrobial pee cloths), and pack out everything — especially toilet paper and your own poop. “Nothing breaks down here,” she says. “It’s the desert. It’ll be here forever.”

Your decisions can have unintended consequences long after you leave.

Even camping comes with a lasting impact. A single off-road vehicle can create a new track others will follow, slowly turning wild land into a road.

Clery’s advice? Stick to established sites. Stay on durable surfaces. And if you really love a place, pick up someone else’s trash on your way out.

Because in the end, exploring slot canyons isn’t just about seeing something beautiful — it’s about being part of something bigger.

It’s about traveling with intention, moving with care, and respecting the delicate power of these hidden places.

But wherever you go, says Clery, “Don’t expect to just show up and be spoon-fed a view. Slot canyons are immersive. They’re humbling. They make you pay attention — and in return, they give you something unforgettable.”

Source: Utah News

What Utah ski resort had the most snow this past winter?

Snowbird and Alta had the most snow among Utah ski/snowboard areas this past winter. Solitude was open longer than any resort in the state in 2024-25. Despite low snow accumulation, Brian Head had its …

KEY POINTS

  • Snowbird and Alta had the most snow among Utah ski/snowboard areas this past winter.
  • Solitude was open longer than any resort in the state in 2024-25.
  • Despite low snow accumulation, Brian Head had its longest season on record.

While past winter wasn’t a banner year for snow in Utah overall, some ski areas put up solid, even impressive totals for the season.

And while the state’s 15 resorts closed earlier this spring, three places in North America — all in the West — remain open for at least another week. Utah resorts are now gearing up for summer activities like mountain biking and hiking.

Preliminary data from the National Ski Areas Association released in May showed that the 2024-25 season marked the second-highest visitation on record at U.S. ski areas, with a total of 61.5 million skier visits, a 1.7% increase over the previous season. A skier visit is counted each time a person uses a lift ticket or pass at a ski area.

Ski resorts in the Rocky Mountain states accounted for nearly 43% of all skier days nationwide during the 2024-25 season, which turned out to be nearly the biggest year ever. The data was preliminary because some areas are still open.

Several resorts were close to if not above their average annual snowfall.

As usual, the resorts in Little and Big Cottonwood canyons picked up the most snow among Utah resorts during the past season. (Snow totals are per Ski Utah.)

Snowbird led the way with 542 inches, one of two resorts in the state to exceed 500 inches this year.

“It has been one heck of a season filled with powdery bliss, slush season frenzy and plenty of shredding to go around. The stoke was high, sometimes the vis was low, but it just meant we were getting dumped on. Where else would you want to be?” reads Snowbird’s season-ending posting.

Neighboring Alta Ski Area in Little Cottonwood Canyon checked in just behind Snowbird with 538 inches.

Ashley Marten and Alastair Moody ski up Little Cottonwood Canyon on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2025. | Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

The long game

In Big Cottonwood Canyon, Brighton Resort had 578 inches, while Solitude ended with 420 inches. With an early opening last November, Solitude totaled 183 days of operation, the most in the state.

“We’ve melted out! We promised to keep you skiing and riding as long and possible — and we did! We kept our lifts spinning deep into May, but Mother Nature has decided it’s time to end the #LongestSeasonInUtah,” according to the resort.

On the Wasatch Back, Park City Mountain ended the season with 306 inches, while Deer Valley closed with 265 inches.

Despite a down snow year — 169 inches total — Brian Head in southern Utah managed to pull off the longest season in its 60-year history with 181 ski days.

A person crashes while skiing in fresh snow at Solitude Mountain Resort in Brighton on Thursday, March 6, 2025. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News

“Thanks to our dedicated team, an early opening in November and strategic investments in snowmaking, we’ve delivered our longest season yet — all while keeping skiing affordable for everyone,“ Amber Palmer, Brian Head marketing manager, said in a press release.

More Utah ski resort totals

Here are totals for the other ski areas in the state, per Ski Utah.

Beaver Mountain — 242 inches

Cherry Peak — 186 inches

Eagle Point — 190 inches

Nordic Valley — 90 inches

Powder Mountain — 253 inches

Snowbasin — 276 inches

Sundance — 213 inches

Woodward Park City — 160 inches

Even though Utah resorts are closed for the year, some lifts are still spinning at Mammoth Mountain in California, Arapahoe Basin in Colorado and Timberline Lodge in Oregon, per OnTheSnow.

Source: Utah News

Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed

A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia while on death row for 37 years is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled late Friday.


Salt Lake City
AP
 — 

A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia while on death row for 37 years is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled late Friday.

Ralph Leroy Menzies, 67, was sentenced to die in 1988 for killing Utah mother of three Maurine Hunsaker. Despite his recent cognitive decline, Menzies “consistently and rationally understands” what is happening and why he is facing execution, Judge Matthew Bates wrote in a court order.

“Menzies has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his understanding of his specific crime and punishment has fluctuated or declined in a way that offends the Eighth Amendment,” which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, Bates said.

Menzies had previously selected a firing squad as his method of execution. He would become only the sixth U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1977.

The Utah Attorney General’s Office is expected to file a death warrant soon.

Menzies’ lawyers, who had argued his dementia was so severe that he could not understand why he was being put to death, said they plan to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court.

“Ralph Menzies is a severely brain-damaged, wheelchair-bound, 67-year-old man with dementia and significant memory problems,” his attorney, Lindsey Layer, said in a statement. “It is deeply troubling that Utah plans to remove Mr. Menzies from his wheelchair and oxygen tank to strap him into an execution chair and shoot him to death.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has spared others prisoners with dementia from execution, including an Alabama man in 2019 who had killed a police officer.

Over nearly four decades, attorneys for Menzies filed multiple appeals that delayed his death sentence, which had been scheduled at least twice before it was pushed back.

Hunsaker, a 26-year-old married mother of three, was abducted by Menzies from the convenience store where she worked. She was later found strangled and her throat cut at a picnic area in the Wasatch Mountains of northern Utah. Menzies had Hunsaker’s wallet and several other belongings when he was jailed on unrelated matters. He was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes.

Matt Hunsaker, who was 10 years old when his mother was killed, said Friday that the family was overwhelmed with emotion to know that justice would finally be served.

Source: Utah News

Big 12 Official Makes Final Decision on Controversial Penalty From BYU-Utah

Utah athletic director Mark Harlan showed his passionate side during last year’s Holy War matchup. After storming the field and declaring his displeasure with the Big 12 in the postgame press …

Big 12 Official Makes Final Decision on Controversial Penalty From BYU-Utah originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

Utah athletic director Mark Harlan showed his passionate side during last year’s Holy War matchup. After storming the field and declaring his displeasure with the Big 12 in the postgame press conference, he was given a definitive answer on a controversial fourth down penalty. 

Advertisement

Big 12 officials coordinator Greg Burks said the holding call that extended BYU’s game-winning drive against Utah was the correct call, according to the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal.

BYU was down by two points and faced a 4th and 10 at their own 9 with 1:30 to go. Quarterback Jake Retzlaff was sacked on the play, but it was negated due to a holding penalty with receiver JoJo Phillips on the ground. The Big 12 officials called a holding penalty on Utah’s Zemaiah Vaughn for pulling Phillips down. The call extended the drive, allowing Will Ferrin to boot a 44-yard field goal as time expired.

Harlan said the contest was “stolen” from Utah. He was later fined $40K by the Big 12.

The Avalanche-Journal obtained a copy of the Big 12’s response to the University of Utah through an open records request and published it on Friday. In total, Utah questioned six calls from the game. The one most scrutinized was the holding call.

Advertisement

Related: Lil Wayne Turns Heads With Shout Out to Former BYU Star in Tha Carter VI

“(Retzlaff) looks to (Phillips) immediately after the snap, as the receiver moves to go around the defender, the defender grabs the receiver and prevents him from running his route. Correct call,” Burks said in response to Utah’s questioning of the call, according to The Avalanche-Journal.

Related: BYU Officials Send Clear Message About Jake Retzlaff’s Future in Provo

The report helps put to bed the controversy between the Cougars and Utes. This year’s edition of the Holy War will shift to Provo on Oct. 18.

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.

Source: Utah News

Big 12 Reportedly Confirms Controversial Holding Call in BYU’s Comeback Win Over Utah

After BYU’s dramatic 22-21 win over Utah, Utah director of athletics Mark Harlan took the stage to claim that the referees ‘stole’ the game from Utah. Harlan’s …

After BYU’s dramatic 22-21 win over Utah, Utah director of athletics Mark Harlan took the stage to claim that the referees “stole” the game from Utah. Harlan’s comments, at least from someone in his position, were unprecedented in the history of the BYU-Utah rivalry.

“This game was absolutely stolen from us,” Harlan said. “We were excited about being in the Big 12, but tonight we are not. We won this game. Someone else stole it from us. I’m very disappointed. I will talk to the commissioner. This was not fair to our team. I’m disgusted by the professionalism of the officiating crew tonight. Thank you.”

Harlan was referring to a holding call that extended BYU’s eventual game-winning drive and gave BYU life with 1:30 remaining. BYU was faced with 4th & 10 from its own nine yard-line and BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff was sacked. A turnover on downs at that point would have ended the game. Instead, a defensive holding penalty was called on Utah DB Zemaiah Vaughn and BYU was given a first down.

The controversial call, and Harlan’s post-game rant, made national headlines.

Turns out, the Big 12 believes the correct call was made. Every week, teams can submit plays for review to Big 12 football officials coordinator Greg Burks. The team states their view on the call and Burks markes either “agree” or “disagree”.

The Avalanche-Journal obtained the game-review document of the BYU-Utah game by accident. According to their article, the Avalanche-Journal “obtained the game-review document via an open-records request to Texas Tech for correspondence with the Big 12 relating to the Tech-Colorado game the same day.” Included in the game-review document were all Big 12 games from that weekend, including BYU-Utah.

The Utah staff questioned the controversial call on the final drive, saying the contact “does not impede the WR ability to progress vertically up the field.”

Burks marked “disagree”. Burks responded, saying “QB (Retzlaff) looks to #5 (Vaughn) immediately after the snap, as receiver moves to go around the defender, the defender grabs the receiver and prevents him from running his route. Correct call.”

The Utah staff submitted six plays for reviews. Burks “disagreed” with the Utah staff on five out of six. The only call where Burks was aligned with the Utah staff was a “holding” call in the third quarter. The referees mistakenly announced a “holding” call on #82 instead of #83. The call itself was not in question.

Burks is not afraid to go against the original calls on the field, either. According to the Avalanche-Journal, Burks acknowledged incorrect calls on 5/13 plays submitted for review in the Colorado-Texas Tech game. Burks also acknowledged incorrect calls on 2/10 plays from the Cincinnati-West Virginia game.

Burks’ review contradicts Harlan’s statements, claiming the game was “stolen” from Utah.

Perhaps more bizarre than his comments after the game were Harlan’s actions before the game was even over. After BYU made the game-winning field goal to take a 22-21 lead, Utah had one final play to try to win the game. The Utes made it to midfield with some lateral attempts before being tackled. A flag for unsportsmanlike conduct was thrown on Utah during the play and the game ended. The flag was called on the “Utah bench”, so initially it was unclear who caused the flag to be thrown.

Turns out, the penalty was on Mark Harlan. Harlan entered the field of play before the game was over. Images of Harlan on the field during the final play have made their way to social media. Harlan is seen walking on the field towards the referee while Smith Snowden is returning the kickoff.

So what does that mean? Even if Utah had pulled off a miraculous touchdown, it wouldn’t have counted. The flag against Harlan would have offset the touchdown and BYU would have won.

Actions like the ones from Mark Harlan were unprecedented. Athletic Directors should never enter the field during the game – Harlan entered the field on the final play and his actions could have cost Utah the game. Athletic Directors typically don’t confront referees after games – Harlan confronted the referees after the game. Athletic Directors don’t address the media after games – Harlan took the stage to express his frustration with the referees.

The post-game rant by Harlan was a bad look for the Big 12. Turns out, there was no basis for his rant and post-game antics in the first place.

Source: Utah News

A Utah MLM went under. Now, a lawsuit claims it was hiding its insolvency.

This Utah MLM hasn’t filed for bankruptcy, but it was financially “insolvent” before it abruptly closed, a new lawsuit claims.

In the two months since Modere, a Utah-based multilevel marketing company, abruptly shut down, a picture of the company’s finances has started to take form.

Modere and its executives have not filed for bankruptcy. Shaklee, a nutritional supplement company in Florida, has bought most of the company’s assets, according to a news release issued May 23. But a lawsuit filed last week accuses Modere of being financially “insolvent” — which is why, the suit claims, Modere owes CSB Nutrition nearly $2 million.

CSB Nutrition, based in Spanish Fork, manufactures nutritional supplements and was one of Modere’s largest suppliers, the lawsuit claims. Even before Modere shut down, CSB Nutrition claims Modere was slow to pay its invoices and rarely paid them in full.

“Modere wanted to make just enough payments in attempting to ensure that CSB did not refuse to continue manufacturing existing or new purchase orders,” the complaint says.

Modere also is being sued in federal court by former employees who claim they are entitled to 60 days of wages and were entitled to 60 days of notice — which they did not get — under the federal WARN Act. The suit says Modere had about 160 employees who should have been eligible for the payout and the advance notice of their jobs ending.

[Read more: Here’s why Utah SkyWest workers know a layoff is coming — and Pluralsight employees didn’t]

CSB’s lawsuit includes evidence that even high-level executives at Modere did not see the closure coming. Billy Reif, Modere’s senior director of strategic sourcing and CSB’s main contact, sent a text to CSB co-owner Jeff Bancroft on April 11 claiming Modere “just informed me that they’ll be ceasing operations at 5pm today,” according to court documents.

Until the day it closed, Modere claimed it was growing and profiting, the lawsuit claims. It made “repeated written and verbal” statements to CSB that demand for its products was increasing and that it was “on a growth trajectory,” CSB claims. It bought “very large quantities” of CSB products until the day before it closed, the lawsuit claims.

Weeks before it closed, Modere also announced new products and touted the company’s success at a “major international convention in Prague.”

But behind the scenes, CSB’s lawsuit claims, Modere had “a huge amount of debt” and had failed to secure additional funding from its two private equity owners, who instead “walked away” from the company.

Now, CSB can’t reach Modere. CSB attorneys sent demand letters to Modere’s former in-house attorney, the lawsuit claims, who responded she would make sure it got in the right hands. She has not responded to subsequent messages, according to the complaint.

These new lawsuits follow litigation that’s still pending between Modere and former high-profile employees.

Last year, Modere sued top-tier distributors Amber DeLoof and Brynn Lang, along with Marina Simone and her distributor company Body Fuel Unlimited, Inc., arguing they had breached their contracts by working with a competitor.

But Judge Jill N. Parrish denied the company’s request for a temporary restraining order against the women last May. Modere had chosen to allow people to sign up as independent businesses — not as individuals — and it couldn’t hold the women to clauses in contracts that their companies had entered, Parrish ruled. Modere voluntarily dismissed its suit against the women weeks later.

Body Fuel Unlimited then sued Modere on March 28 alleging trademark infringement. Body Fuel offered a trademarked “5-DAY-DROP” — a weight loss service that includes made-to-order meal plans and dietary consultations, according to court documents.

Modere offered a competing weight loss service with a “nearly identical name — “5 Day Drop” — court documents allege, despite knowing the name was trademarked.

Modere also has a lawsuit pending against former contractor Justin Prince, a Utahn who it describes as “one of the most, if not the most, visible distributor at Modere and possibly the entire direct sales industry.” Prince and Modere have sued each other over claims related to his departure.

Meanwhile, Shaklee is selling Modere products — including those manufactured by CSB, according to the lawsuit — on its website.

Shannon Sollitt is a Report for America corps member covering business accountability and sustainability for The Salt Lake Tribune. Your donation to match our RFA grant helps keep her writing stories like this one; please consider making a tax-deductible gift of any amount today by clicking here.

Source: Utah News

How Big 12 officials coordinator Greg Burks answered Utah’s beef over bitter loss to BYU

Zemaiah Vaughn’s defensive holding at key moment was key to BYU football victory at Utah. Here’s what Big 12’s Greg Burks said about the call.

Blasting officials after last year’s Utah-BYU football game earned Utah athletics director Mark Harlan a $40,000 fine and a public reprimand from the Big 12.

Days later, Big 12 football officials coordinator Greg Burks indicated there was no basis for Harlan’s post-game rant. In a game-review document of the officials obtained by the Avalanche-Journal, Burks said a hotly contested penalty against Utah cornerback Zemaiah Vaughn was called correctly. In all, Burks disagreed with the Utah staff’s views of how five of six plays they submitted for review were officiated.

Advertisement

The game-winning drive in BYU‘s 22-21 victory on Nov. 9 at Utah was kept alive by a defensive holding call on fourth down with 1:29 left in the game. Trailing 21-19 at the time but given new life, the Cougars drove for a game-winning field goal with four seconds left.

Harlan took the podium in the post-game interview area and told reporters, “This game was absolutely stolen from us.”

More: How Big 12 answered Joey McGuire complaints after Colorado-Texas Tech football game

More: Behind scenes, Kirby Hocutt called for transparency on Big 12 football officiating

Nov 9, 2024; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; The Utah Utes offense lines up against the Brigham Young Cougars defense during the first quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-Imagn Images

Nov 9, 2024; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; The Utah Utes offense lines up against the Brigham Young Cougars defense during the first quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-Imagn Images

Big 12 officials coordinator Greg Burks backed crew on controversial call in BYU-Utah game

Big 12 coaches can send in plays to the conference office for feedback after each game. For each play in question, a coach or team representative provides question or comment about how officials handled it. Burks marks “agree” or “disagree” with the team’s view, then offers his comment and explanation.

Advertisement

BYU’s Jojo Phillips was the wide receiver on the disputed play, split out to the left.

“Would like clarity as to the penalty for defensive holding by #5 (Vaughn),” a Utah staff member wrote. “The contact occurs near the line of scrimmage and does not impede the WR ability to progress vertically up the field.”

Burks marked “disagree” and responded, “QB looks to #5 immediately after the snap, as receiver moves to go around the defender, the defender grabs the receiver and prevents him from running his route. Correct call.”

The situation was fourth-and-10 from the BYU 9-yard line. Two defenders sacked quarterback Jake Retzlaff for an 8-yard loss as the crowd at Rice-Eccles Stadium celebrated only to have the sack erased by the penalty.

Advertisement

Utah coach Kyle Whittingham complained to the side judge after the play and the field judge on the field after the game, and Harlan confronted referee Kevin Mar on the field after the game.

Jul 21, 2023; Las Vegas, NV, USA; Utah Utes athletic director Mark Harlan during Pac-12 Media Day at Resorts World Las Vegas. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Jul 21, 2023; Las Vegas, NV, USA; Utah Utes athletic director Mark Harlan during Pac-12 Media Day at Resorts World Las Vegas. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

In the interview room, Harlan said, “We won this game. Someone else stole it from us. Very disappointed.

“This was not fair to our team. I’m disgusted by the professionalism of the officiating crew tonight.”

BYU moved to 9-0, but lost its next two games and finished 11-2.

The Avalanche-Journal obtained the game-review document via an open-records request to Texas Tech for correspondence with the Big 12 relating to the Tech-Colorado game the same day. Texas Tech deferred to the Texas Attorney’s General office for an open-records decision on a portion of the material.

Advertisement

Months later, the AG’s office ruled for full disclosure of all the pertinent documents. The officiating-review sheets of the Tech-Colorado game were attached to those of three other Big 12 games on Nov. 9.

Nov 9, 2024; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Brigham Young Cougars quarterback Jake Retzlaff (12) is sacked by Utah Utes cornerback Zemaiah Vaughn (5) during the second half at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-Imagn Images

Nov 9, 2024; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Brigham Young Cougars quarterback Jake Retzlaff (12) is sacked by Utah Utes cornerback Zemaiah Vaughn (5) during the second half at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-Imagn Images

How conference office compared Utah-BYU football officiating to other Big 12 games the same day

Coaches from Texas Tech and Colorado sent in 13 plays for review of officiating. Burks said he disagreed with the coaches on eight and agreed on five, acknowledging incorrect calls or no-calls in the latter. The Cincinnati staff differed with officials on 10 plays in its game against West Virginia. Burks disagreed on eight and agreed there were two missed calls.

Advertisement

For comparison, the document shows six plays submitted by the Utah staff after the BYU game. Burks agreed with the Utes on only one, acknowledging a wrong player being identified on a holding penalty.

The Utah football staff sent in six plays for review from the Utah-Brigham Young game on Nov. 9, 2024. Big 12 football officials coordinator Greg Burks disagreed with the Utes' views on five.

The Utah football staff sent in six plays for review from the Utah-Brigham Young game on Nov. 9, 2024. Big 12 football officials coordinator Greg Burks disagreed with the Utes’ views on five.

The Utah staff wondered whether defensive holding should have been called on BYU defenders on back-to-back plays early in the third quarter. On a play involving wide receiver Dorian Singer, a Utah staff member asked, “Does the contact of the CB at the top of the route restrict the WR’s ability to make a play on the ball?”

Burks disagreed and explained, “Receiver stops and comes back for the pass. Defender has right arm around receivers waist and knocks the pass down with his left hand. Defender does not turn the receivers hip. Correct no call.”

Advertisement

The Utes also questioned a “‘hook’ or pull from behind by the defender” on Utes tight end Brant Kuithe on the next play. As Kuithe ran his route across the formation, quarterback Brandon Rose threw incomplete to another receiver.

Burks disagreed and wrote, “This action is a foul that occurs at the same time as the ball is being thrown to a different receiver. Official sees the restriction and then looks to the QB. When the ball goes to a different receiver, the foul is disregarded. Had the QB been looking at this receiver or had the ball been thrown to him, this would be a foul.”

Two plays before the defensive holding call against Vaughn, the Utah staff on the review document suggested Retzlaff could have been called for intentional grounding and, on the same play, offensive lineman Austin Leausa for an illegal block.

Burks disagreed, writing, “QB is outside the box and the pass is beyond the LOS (line of scrimmage). Legal. The block by 55 is with extended arms not the torso. Legal.”

This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: How Big 12 answered Utah’s beef over hotly contested call in BYU game

Source: Utah News

A closer look at Utah’s future nonconference schedules through 2033

The Utes and Bruins open the 2025 season on Aug. 30 in a game that will be televised on Fox and will feature plenty of storylines, from Utah with New Mexico transfer quarterback Devon Dampier to UCLA …

This article was first published in the Ute Insiders newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Wednesday night.

Utah’s nonconference schedule this season is pretty intriguing, starting off with a return to the Rose Bowl to play UCLA.

Advertisement

The Utes and Bruins open the 2025 season on Aug. 30 in a game that will be televised on Fox and will feature plenty of storylines, from Utah with New Mexico transfer quarterback Devon Dampier to UCLA with Tennessee transfer quarterback Nico Iamaleava.

Both teams are coming off losing records and are eager to start the season on the right note.

After that, the Utes make their first trip to Laramie since 2010 to play Wyoming. Yes, the Utes have won nine of the last 10 against the Cowboys, but War Memorial Stadium always is a tough place to play.

The Utes then round out nonconference play with their first meeting against Cal Poly.

Advertisement

With limited openings, college football nonconference schedules fill up fast, and on Wednesday, the Utes — which have games scheduled out to 2033 — added another game.

Utah will host Nevada in 2028, filling out a three-game nonconference slate that includes games at Wisconsin and vs. Utah Tech.

Here’s a look at the complete future nonconference schedule for the Utes, from 2026 to 2033.

2026

  • vs. Arkansas

  • vs. Utah State

The Utes will start the 2026 season with a rare phenomenon — opening up with three consecutive nonconference home games.

Utah will meet Idaho for the first time since 1993 (the Utes lost that game 28-18), then will host Arkansas for the first-ever meeting between the two schools.

Advertisement

After that, it’s a return of the Battle of the Brothers against Utah State, which pays a visit to Salt Lake City for the first time since 2015. The Utes are currently riding a three-game win streak against the Aggies.

2027

  • vs. Miami (FL) in Las Vegas

  • vs. Wyoming

At last year’s Big 12 media days at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas, Utah coach Kyle Whittingham said that he “probably won’t” be the Utes’ coach for that game.

“It’s been a great opportunity to play here as much as we have,” Whittingham said of Allegiant Stadium, which hosted the Pac-12 championship games.

“We’re going to open here in 2027 against the Miami Hurricanes. I probably won’t be sitting here in this chair, but somebody will. That’s going to be a great opportunity to come to Vegas and play again.”

Advertisement

Whittingham’s contract runs through 2027, but it could be Morgan Scalley in the head coach position when the first-ever meeting between the Utes and Hurricanes happens in Vegas.

The Utes also host Wyoming for the first time since 2009, when the two teams were members of the Mountain West Conference, as part of a home-and-home agreement between the schools. As noted, Utah heads to Laramie this year for the first leg.

2028

  • vs. Utah Tech

  • vs. Nevada

  • at Wisconsin

The Utes will open with instate opponent Utah Tech, the first meeting on the gridiron between the two schools. Then, Utah hosts Nevada for the first meeting between the programs since 1945.

BYU defensive back Micah Hannemann (7) breaks up a pass intended for Wisconsin Badgers wide receiver Danny Davis III (6) at LaVell Edwards Stadium in Provo on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017.

BYU’s Micah Hannemann (7) breaks up a pass intended for Wisconsin receiver Danny Davis III (6) at LaVell Edwards Stadium in Provo on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017. In 2028, the Utes will face the Badgers in Madison, Wisconsin, for the first time since 1987. | Spenser Heaps, Deseret News

The crown jewel of the nonconference schedule in 2028 is a visit to Camp Randall Stadium as the Utes return to Madison, Wisconsin, for the first time since 1987, when the Utes defeated the Badgers, 31-28.

Advertisement

It will be the fourth meeting between the two programs and the first since 1996, when Wisconsin beat Utah 38-10 in the 1996 Copper Bowl.

There should be a sizable amount of Ute fans that make the trip, and getting to witness “Jump Around” in person will be a highlight.

2029

  • vs. Weber State

  • at Arkansas

After hosting Weber State, the Utes will hit the road for their first-ever visit to Fayetteville, Arkansas. As part of the return leg from the home-and-home series, the Utes will head into SEC territory to face the Razorbacks. As is the case for any Power Four nonconference game, the trip to Arkansas is going to provide a lot of excitement early in the season.

2030

  • vs. Utah Tech

Advertisement

After another game against Utah Tech, the UCLA Bruins come to town for the second half of the home-and-home series against an old Pac-12 foe. The Utes are 9-12 all time against the Bruins, but have won four of the last five meetings between the two schools, including a 14-7 win at Rice-Eccles Stadium in 2023, the Pac-12’s final year.

2031

  • vs. Utah State

History will be made at Rice-Eccles Stadium as the Utes welcome in LSU for the first time ever.

This far in advance, it’s impossible to tell how good each team will be, but LSU and Utah both have winning traditions, and it could be one of the marquee nonconference games in the country that year.

Advertisement

Along with Michigan, Florida and USC, LSU is one of the top-tier opponents that has made the trek to Salt Lake City, and it should make for a memorable game.

2032

Perhaps the most exciting opponent on Utah’s nonconference schedule, the Utes will travel to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to play LSU.

The Utes will visit Tiger Stadium, also known as Death Valley, during the 2032 season. | Gerald Herbert, Associated Press

The Utes will visit Tiger Stadium, also known as Death Valley, during the 2032 season. | Gerald Herbert, Associated Press

It’s not the first time the Utes have made the trip — they played at LSU in 1974 and 1976, both losses — but it’s the first time in quite a while.

Visiting “Death Valley” should be a treat for Ute fans, especially those who enjoyed their visit to the “Swamp” when Utah played Florida in 2022.

2033

  • vs. Wisconsin

Wisconsin makes the return trip after hosting the Utes in 2028.

Advertisement

Just like LSU, Wisconsin joins an elite list of brand-name teams that have played in Salt Lake City.

The Badgers and the Utes will face off on Sept. 10, 2033. The players that will play in that game are still a ways off from high school, but when the game rolls around, there will be plenty of excitement in Salt Lake City.

In case you missed it

It’s been a slow start to the 2026 recruiting cycle for the Utes, but things are heating up, with 40-plus official visitors rolling through campus in June. Here are the five biggest targets for Utah in the 2026 class.

From the archives

Extra points

Source: Utah News

Memphis basketball will meet Utah State in February non-conference game | Source

Penny Hardaway is shaking things up, adding a non-conference game against Utah State to the Memphis basketball schedule in February.

Source: Utah News