Payton Gives Encouraging Update on Broncos Rookie TE Caleb Lohner

The Broncos’ seventh-round rookie will stay within the embrace of the team for the foreseeable future, where he can continue to learn and develop, and, as head coach Sean Payton said on Thursday, try …

For a brief moment, it seemed that the Caleb Lohner experiment at Denver Broncos headquarters may have been over. At the very least, the Broncos rolled the dice on that being a possibility by cutting Lohner ahead of Tuesday’s deadline, as an outside team could have claimed him off waivers, and he would have been gone.

That didn’t happen, though. The Broncos probably expected Lohner to go unclaimed, and he was subsequently re-signed to the practice squad.

The Broncos’ seventh-round rookie will stay within the embrace of the team for the foreseeable future, where he can continue to learn and develop, and, as head coach Sean Payton said on Thursday, try to make up some ground on all the lost reps that separate an inexperienced player like Lohner, and nearly every other player in the NFL.

“There’s a large learning curve, and he’s getting it, and he’s getting better and he’s improving,” Payton said of Lohner. “You have to remember, he’s 2,847 snaps behind everyone else.”

What happens next for the Broncos? Don’t miss out on any news and analysis! Take a second, sign up for our free newsletter, and get breaking Broncos news delivered to your inbox daily!

Denver Broncos tight end Caleb Lohner (84) before the game against the San Francisco 49ers at Levi's Stadium.

August 9, 2025; Santa Clara, California, USA; Denver Broncos tight end Caleb Lohner (84) before the game against the San Francisco 49ers at Levi’s Stadium. / Kyle Terada-Imagn Images

Lohner, a former five-year college basketball player, infamously entered the NFL with only 57 snaps of Division I football under his belt at the University of Utah. He totaled four career receptions, but every single one of them was a touchdown.

That red-zone threat Lohner poses got visions of touchdowns and matchups dancing in Payton’s head before the 2025 NFL draft. Alas, Lohner proved to be woefully in over his head initially as the Broncos coached him up, especially as it related to blocking.

Lohner would only finish with a pair of catches in the preseason, but how the young tight end acquitted himself over the final 10 days of training camp may have been a big reason he was brought back on the practice squad. As Payton explained on Thursday, when it comes to the practice squad, there are two types of players: the developmental sort, which Lohner most certainly is, and the “Tidewater” variety, who can be called up in-season to contribute in games.

Still, Payton can’t help but continue drawing the Jimmy Graham parallels when Lohner’s name comes up.

“Here’s the thing, there’s so much unknown, limited information, so it has to start with developmental. Then it was no different with Jimmy,” Payton said. “Then you just have to see how quickly that learning curve happens. I felt like the last 10 days for him [Lohner] has been improved. That doesn’t mean the developmental player by Week 8 can’t all of a sudden be someone that…”

Payton trailed off at the end there, but his point was that just because a practice-squad player is of the developmental variety doesn’t mean that he can’t be elevated and used in the regular-season games as he shows improvements to the coaches.

Lohner still has a long way to go. But he showed progress toward the end of camp. And his head coach is still clearly in his corner.

“There are two types of players that are on the practice squad. There’s the developmental player, and we see a future but it might be Year 2, [Year] 3 from now. Then there’s that Tidewater [Tides] player,” Payton said using a mixed-sports metaphor with Minor League Baseball. “The Tidewater players, we have a number of them that we feel very confident in the event of an injury at a certain position, bam—they’re up.”

Recommended Articles

Who knows? Perhaps by season’s end, Lohner will graduate from developmental to Tidewater and contribute as a late-round rookie. More likely, though, is a Year 2 ro Year 3 emergence, if it happens at all. Let’s hope that it does, because Payton and Bo Nix could find all sorts of good uses for Lohner’s athleticism locked within his 6-foot-7, 250-pound frame.

Source: Utah News

Utah State vs. UTEP Prediction, Odds, Picks – August 30, 2025

Preview the Aug. 30 matchup between the Utah State Aggies and UTEP Miners with predictions, odds, over/under, spread, betting lines and more.

Data Skrive

The UTEP Miners (0-0) are 6-point underdogs heading into their matchup on Saturday, August 30, 2025 against the Utah State Aggies (0-0). The total for this game has been set at 60.5 points.

Last year the Aggies fell short of a bowl appearance after finishing 4-8 during the regular season. On offense, they averaged 31.9 points per game (35th in college football), and they conceded 37.8 per game (128th in college football) defensively. The Miners failed to make a bowl appearance last year after going 3-9 during the regular season. They scored 19.5 points per game (122nd in college football) and conceded 32.3 (113th).

ADVERTISEMENT

Keep up with college football all season on FOX Sports.

Utah State vs. UTEP Game Information & Odds

  • When: Saturday, August 30, 2025 at 7:30 p.m. ET
  • Location: Merlin Olsen Field at Maverik Stadium in Logan, Utah
  • TV: CBS Sports Network
  • Live Box Score on FOX Sports
Utah State vs UTEP Betting Information updated as of August 28, 2025, 7:45 p.m. ET.
Favorite Spread (Odds) Favorite Moneyline Underdog Moneyline Total Over Moneyline Under Moneyline
Utah State -6 (-115) -227 +186 60.5 -110 -110

Utah State vs. UTEP Prediction

  • Pick ATS: Utah State (-6)
  • Pick OU: Over (60.5)
  • Prediction: Utah State 37, UTEP 24

Predictions are made by the Data Skrive betting model.

Learn more about the Utah State Aggies vs. the UTEP Miners game on FOX Sports!

Utah State vs. UTEP Betting Insights

  • Per the spread and over/under, the implied score for the matchup is Aggies 33, Miners 27.
  • The Aggies have a 69.4% chance to win this meeting based on the moneyline’s implied probability. The Miners hold a 35.0% implied probability.
  • Utah State compiled a 5-6-0 record against the spread last season.
  • UTEP compiled a 5-7-0 ATS record last season.

Utah State vs. UTEP: 2024 Stats Comparison

Utah State UTEP
Off. Points per Game (Rank) 31.9 (51) 19.5 (122)
Def. Points per Game (Rank) 37.8 (127) 32.3 (107)
Turnovers Allowed (Rank) 22 (107) 19 (74)
Turnovers Forced (Rank) 16 (77) 18 (59)

Utah State 2024 Key Players

Name Position Stats
Rahsul Faison RB 1,109 YDS / 8 TD / 92.4 YPG / 5.6 YPC
22 REC / 99 REC YDS / 0 REC TD / 11 REC YPG
Bryson Barnes QB 856 YDS (61.1%) / 12 TD / 6 INT
530 RUSH YDS / 5 RUSH TD / 48.2 RUSH YPG
Spencer Petras QB 2,315 YDS (65.4%) / 17 TD / 11 INT
35 RUSH YDS / 1 RUSH TD / 3.2 RUSH YPG
Jalen Royals WR 55 REC / 834 YDS / 6 TD / 119.1 YPG
Jordan Vincent DB 112 TKL / 0 TFL / 4 INT / 4 PD
Ike Larsen DB 76 TKL / 2 TFL / 1 INT / 1 PD
Cian Slone DL 40 TKL / 6 TFL / 7.5 SACK
D.J. Graham II DB 41 TKL / 1 TFL / 2 INT / 2 PD

UTEP 2024 Key Players

Name Position Stats
Skyler Locklear QB 1,583 YDS (63.5%) / 10 TD / 6 INT
237 RUSH YDS / 2 RUSH TD / 21.5 RUSH YPG
Kenny Odom WR 47 REC / 761 YDS / 8 TD / 63.4 YPG
Jevon Jackson RB 754 YDS / 4 TD / 62.8 YPG / 3.9 YPC
16 REC / 99 REC YDS / 2 REC TD / 9.9 REC YPG
Kam Thomas RB 27 YDS / 0 TD / 3 YPG / 2.1 YPC
46 REC / 512 REC YDS / 2 REC TD / 51.2 REC YPG
Kory Chapman DB 61 TKL / 8 TFL / 3 SACK / 2 INT
Dorian Hopkins LB 68 TKL / 5 TFL / 1 SACK / 2 INT
Maurice Westmoreland DB 33 TKL / 8 TFL / 7.5 SACK
Nate Dyman LB 61 TKL / 7 TFL / 1.5 SACK

FOX Sports created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Want great stories delivered right to your inbox?

Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.

FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience

What did you think of this story?



in this topic

Source: Utah News

Utah officials betting on this institute to become a hub where research and technology materialize

State officials and higher education leaders have launched the Nucleus Institute, an organization they hope to see become a crucial tool for Utah innovators to compete at a global level, finding …

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox speaks at the launch of the Nucleus Institute on Aug. 27, 2025 (Alixel Cabrera/Utah News Dispatch)

State officials and higher education leaders have launched the Nucleus Institute, an organization they hope to see become a crucial tool for Utah innovators to compete at a global level, finding solutions for emerging energy needs and developing technologies like artificial intelligence.

The organization stems from a law passed in the 2025 legislative session that restructured the Utah Innovation Lab and created the institute as “an independent, nonprofit, quasi-public corporation.” The goal is to connect higher education, industry and government to make ideas become reality. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

With the institute, researchers and entrepreneurs can search for solutions to early-stage funding challenges, moving forward from concept to market, or finding spaces to collaborate.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said during the launch on Wednesday the institute will help make Utahns’ lives easier by finding solutions to keep energy prices low, decarbonizing the atmosphere and other challenges the country faces.

“We are never going to regulate our way out of the most difficult problems that we’re facing as a country,” Cox said. “We can only innovate, and the state does play a role in that, and so does higher ed, but especially the private sector.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

The institute is expected to collaborate with different innovation campuses across the state, including those in authorities like the Point of the Mountain and the Inland Port, but also other innovation labs in public universities.

And with the help of those partnerships, Cox said, this and future generations of Utahns will be able to build their innovation skills in a thriving environment.

“It is all about passing that knowledge of innovation, those skills that are so necessary to compete on a global scale, and passing them on to the next generation,” Cox said. “It’s about investing in companies that are going to solve those wicked problems that we’re facing right now as a country. We know that the solutions are out there. We just need to discover them.” 

In a way, the new organization is a response to the unprecedented speed of change in different technologies, said Jefferson Moss, director of the Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, and now, also leader of the Nucleus Institute.

 Jefferson Moss, director of the Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity and the Nucleus Institute speaks at the launch of the Nucleus Institute on Aug. 27, 2025 (Alixel Cabrera/Utah News Dispatch)

Jefferson Moss, director of the Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity and the Nucleus Institute speaks at the launch of the Nucleus Institute on Aug. 27, 2025 (Alixel Cabrera/Utah News Dispatch)

“We led the nation on AI. We led the nation on data privacy. We’re leading the nation on energy. We can do that because we have people in the government that actually get along and want to get stuff done,” Moss said. “And then you take that and combine it with both the great things we’re doing in education.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

President of the University of Utah, Taylor Randall said he was excited to be part of the initiative since the state’s flagship university dedicates almost $800 million a year in research, including important medical advancements like the first artificial heart implant for a human. 

Let us know what you think…

“But that research is no good if it stays in the lab,” Randall said. Nucleus, he added, is a way to step on the gas to incorporate those types of discoveries into people’s lives.

More in U.S.

The Legislature allocated $555,400 from the Income Tax Fund for compensation and benefits for the institute board’s executive director, for the compensation of the chair of the innovation fund, and an annual contracted audit during years 2026 and 2027, according to the bill’s fiscal note. 

Senate Majority Leader, Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, who sponsored the legislation in the Senate, said that while the institute is expected to collaborate with for-profit industries, it’s still a nonprofit structure.

Advertisement

Advertisement

“The goal is to boost the economy in Utah, to boost the workforce in Utah, to boost innovation and commercialization of that innovation here,” Cullimore said. “So it’s not really a business idea, and it’s government-esque, but playing in that more innovation and entrepreneurial space to kind of help facilitate all these things.”

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Source: Utah News

Inside look at Utah Mammoth

The Utah Mammoth are developing — as an organization, as a team, as a group of mostly young players. Their inaugural season laid groundwork. The Mammoth (38-31-13) became part of the sports fabric in …

The Utah Mammoth are developing — as an organization, as a team, as a group of mostly young players.

Their inaugural season laid groundwork. The Mammoth (38-31-13) became part of the sports fabric in Utah but finished sixth in the Central Division.

This season, that won’t be considered enough.

“We’ve got bigger aspirations of getting in (the Stanley Cup Playoffs),” general manager Bill Armstrong said, “and you’re going to see that right away.”

They already have some of the right pieces.

Clayton Keller, 27, led Utah with 90 points (30 goals, 60 assists) last season. Logan Cooley, 21, had 65 points (25 goals, 40 assists) in his second season. Dylan Guenther, 22, was fourth with 60 points (27 goals, 33 assists), behind 29-year-old forward Nick Schmaltz (63 points; 20 goals, 43 assists).

“I’m super excited about our group,” said Keller, the Mammoth captain. “So confident in our guys, our prospects. We just have a great mold and mix of guys that all love being around each other. Everyone’s like a family on our team.”

But Utah averaged 2.93 goals last season, tied with the New Jersey Devils for 20th in the League.

“Everything can always be better,” president of hockey operations Chris Armstrong said. “How can we be 10 percent better in every area? How can everybody, as individuals, get 10 percent better in this offseason?”

Bringing in forward JJ Peterka might help. The 23-year-old, who had an NHL career-high 68 points (27 goals, 41 assists) last season, was acquired in a trade from the Buffalo Sabres on June 26 and signed a five-year, $38.5 million contract.

“If you look at his points last year, he’s roughly around what Cooley was,” Bill Armstrong said. “So, he’s got an opportunity to come in and have an impact on our top two lines. I think it’s something that he can grow into.”

Defenseman Nate Schmidt and forward Brandon Tanev could add a veteran presence. Schmidt signed a three-year, $10.5 million contract on July 1 after winning the Stanley Cup with the Florida Panthers. Tanev agreed to a three-year, $7.5 million contract the same day. Schmidt, 34, and Tanev, 33, would only be younger than defenseman Ian Cole, 36, on the Utah roster.

Source: Utah News

Utah enters the redistricting battle for 2026, but not by choice. Here’s what to know

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah is being thrust into a national battle over redistricting because of a court order to redraw its congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, while President Donald Trump …

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah is being thrust into a national battle over redistricting because of a court order to redraw its congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, while President Donald Trump is pushing other Republican-led states to add winnable U.S. House seats for the GOP.

The new district boundaries could make one of Utah’s four congressional seats competitive for Democrats as the party fights to topple the GOP’s slim majority in the House. Nationally, Democrats need to net three seats next year to take control of the chamber.

The current map divides heavily populated Salt Lake County — an island of Democratic support in an otherwise red state — among all four congressional districts. Before the map was adopted in 2021, one district had traded hands between Democrats and Republicans. All have since elected Republicans by wide margins.

Here’s what to know about Utah’s place in the redistricting fight.

A judge on Monday ordered Utah’s Republican-controlled Legislature to toss its congressional map and quickly adopt a new one. District Court Judge Dianna Gibson declared the map unlawful because the Legislature had circumvented an independent redistricting commission established by voters to ensure districts don’t deliberately favor a party, a practice known as gerrymandering.

Voters in 2018 narrowly approved a ballot initiative that created the commission to draw boundaries for Utah’s legislative and congressional districts, which the Legislature was required to consider. Lawmakers repealed the initiative in 2020 and replaced it with a law that transformed the commission into an advisory board that they could choose to ignore. The following year, lawmakers disregarded a congressional map proposal from the commission and drew one of their own.

The Utah Supreme Court said the Legislature is extremely limited in changing laws passed by voters and sent the case back to Gibson to decide the map’s fate.

“How district lines are drawn can either safeguard representation and ensure accountability by elected representatives or erode public trust, silence voices and weaken the rule of law,” she wrote in the ruling.

Gibson has given lawmakers until Sept. 24 to adopt a map that complies with voter-approved standards. Voting rights advocates who were involved in the legal challenge can submit alternate proposals. But Republican officials could use appeals to try to run out the clock before a candidate filing deadline in early January to possibly delay adopting new maps until 2028.

The U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene, and the state Supreme Court may be hesitant to entertain an appeal after it already asked Gibson to decide.

Utah’s four congressional districts currently converge within a couple blocks in the Salt Lake City suburb of Millcreek. A voter could grab a milkshake at the beloved Iceberg Drive Inn and cross into all four districts before it melts.

Popular Reads

Lawmakers presented the map as a way for each representative to serve both urban and rural areas. One district spans the entire eastern border of the state and groups vastly different communities, from the winter resort town of Park City, to the urban center of Provo, down to the red rock recreation hub of Moab. Voting rights groups who challenged the map argued it intentionally dilutes the Democratic vote and produces congresspeople who aren’t suited to represent all of their constituents.

The tight deadline for lawmakers to draw new maps could push them to reconsider proposals from the independent redistricting commission that they had ignored after the 2020 census. Those plans create a compact district combining the Democrat-heavy cities of Salt Lake City and Park City, while grouping other cities geographically.

GOP leaders could cut their losses by creating a single left-leaning block, or gamble on creating competitive districts that Republicans will fight to keep.

Registered Republicans overwhelmingly outnumber registered Democrats in the state. But voter registration data doesn’t paint the full picture.

Only about 12.3% of Utah voters are registered Democrats, but more than triple that amount voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. About 29% are unaffiliated, and many voters in the state who hold liberal beliefs choose to register as Republicans to vote in the primaries and have a say in intraparty matters.

That uncertainty may create complications for Republicans as they navigate rapidly redrawing boundaries that shield their seats while complying with stricter standards.

The ruling throws Republicans a curveball in a state where they expected a clean sweep while they’re working to add winnable seats elsewhere. Trump has urged governors to take up mid-decade redistricting ahead of the midterms, when the sitting president’s party tends to lose seats.

In Texas, a plan awaiting Gov. Greg Abbott’s approval includes five new districts that would favor Republicans. Ohio Republicans already were scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan, and Indiana, Florida and Missouri may choose to make changes. Some Democrat-led states say they may enter the redistricting arms race, but so far only California has taken action to offset GOP gains in Texas.

The Supreme Court in 2019 ruled that claims of partisan gerrymandering for congressional and legislative districts are outside the purview of federal courts and should be decided by states.

Redistricting typically occurs once a decade after a census. There are no federal restrictions to redrawing districts mid-decade, but some states — more led by Democrats than Republicans — set their own limitations. The Utah redraw may benefit Democrats who have fewer opportunities to gain seats through redistricting.

Source: Utah News

UTEP football previews Week 1 game against Utah State

The countdown to kickoff continues — we’re just four days away from UTEP opening its 2025 season. The Miners are packing their bags and heading to Logan, Utah, to take on the Utah State Aggies. On …

EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The countdown to kickoff continues — we’re just four days away from UTEP opening its 2025 season.

The Miners are packing their bags and heading to Logan, Utah, to take on the Utah State Aggies.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, UTEP held its first weekly press conference of the season — giving us a game-week update on how the Miners are preparing for their opener.

Source: Utah News

Utah enters the redistricting battle for 2026, but not by choice

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah is being thrust into a national battle over redistricting because of a court order to redraw its congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, while President Donald …

By HANNAH SCHOENBAUM

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah is being thrust into a national battle over redistricting because of a court order to redraw its congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, while President Donald Trump is pushing other Republican-led states to add winnable U.S. House seats for the GOP.

Source: Utah News

Judge rules Utah’s legislature must redraw state’s congressional map for 2026 elections

District Court Judge Dianna Gibson, who ruled Monday, made few judgments on the content of the map but declared it unlawful because lawmakers had weakened and ignored an independent commission …

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — The Utah Legislature will need to rapidly redraw the state’s congressional boundaries after a judge ruled Monday that the Republican-controlled body circumvented safeguards put in place by voters to ensure districts aren’t drawn to favor any party.

READ MORE: Texas Senate passes redrawn congressional map favoring GOP, sends to governor

The current map, adopted in 2021, divides Salt Lake County — Utah’s population center and a Democratic stronghold — among the state’s four congressional districts, all of which have since elected Republicans by wide margins.

District Court Judge Dianna Gibson made few judgments on the content of the map but declared it unlawful because lawmakers had weakened and ignored an independent commission established by voters to prevent partisan gerrymandering.

“The nature of the violation lies in the Legislature’s refusal to respect the people’s exercise of their constitutional lawmaking power and to honor the people’s right to reform their government,” Gibson said in the ruling.

New maps will need to be drawn quickly, before candidates start filing in early January for the 2026 midterm elections. The ruling gives lawmakers a deadline of Sept. 24 and allows voting rights groups involved in the legal challenge to submit alternate proposals to the court.

But appeals expected from Republican officials could help them run out the clock to possibly delay adopting new maps until 2028.

Redistricting battle could shift the balance in Congress

The ruling creates uncertainty in a state that was thought to be a clean sweep for the GOP as the party is preparing to defend its slim majority in the U.S. House. Nationally, Democrats need to net three seats next year to take control of the chamber. The sitting president’s party tends to lose seats in the midterms, as was the case for President Donald Trump in 2018.

Trump has urged several Republican-led states to add winnable seats for the GOP. In Texas, a plan awaiting Gov. Greg Abbott’s approval includes five new districts that would favor Republicans. Ohio Republicans already were scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan, and Indiana, Florida and Missouri may choose to make changes. Some Democrat-led states say they may enter the redistricting arms race, but so far only California has taken action to offset GOP gains in Texas.

WATCH: California legislature approves special election on new congressional map favoring Democrats

The U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene, and the Utah Supreme Court may be hesitant to entertain an appeal of Monday’s ruling after it had sent the case back to Gibson for her to decide.

The nation’s high court in 2019 ruled that claims of partisan gerrymandering for congressional and legislative districts are outside the purview of federal courts and should be decided by states.

Voting rights groups celebrate legal victory

David Reymann, an attorney for the voting rights advocates who challenged the map, called the ruling a “watershed moment” for the voices of Utah voters.

“The Legislature in this state is not king,” Reymann told reporters Monday evening.

Leaders from the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee applauded the ruling as a victory for democracy.

Republican Gov. Spencer Cox said he disagrees with the decision but holds respect for Utah’s judiciary. Meanwhile, the state’s GOP Chairman, Robert Axson, dismissed the ruling as “judicial activism.”

Utah’s Republican legislative leaders, Senate President Stuart Adams and House Speaker Mike Schultz, said in a joint statement that they are disappointed by the ruling and are carefully considering their next steps.

In 2018, voters narrowly approved a ballot initiative that created an independent redistricting commission to draw boundaries for Utah’s legislative and congressional districts, which the Legislature was required to consider. Lawmakers repealed the initiative in 2020 and replaced it with a law that transformed the commission into an advisory board that they could choose to ignore.

The following year, lawmakers disregarded a congressional map proposal from the commission and drew one of their own that carved up Salt Lake County among four reliably Republican districts.

READ MORE: Utah high court scrutinizes process that sliced state’s most Democrat-heavy county into 4 districts

Voting rights advocates sued, arguing the map drawn by lawmakers constituted partisan gerrymandering that favored Republicans. They also said the Legislature violated the rights of voters when it repealed and replaced the 2018 initiative.

The case made its way to the Utah Supreme Court, which ruled that the Legislature cannot change laws approved through ballot initiatives except to reinforce them, or to advance a compelling government interest. The five-member panel sent the case back to Gibson in the lower court to decide whether lawmakers would have to redraw boundaries set as part of a redistricting process that happens every 10 years.

Lawmakers and voters clash over redistricting

The ruling Monday reinstates the voter-approved redistricting standards that lawmakers had overturned.

Utah was one of four states where voters approved measures designed to reduce partisan gerrymandering in 2018. As in Utah, Missouri’s Republican-led Legislature quickly sought to repeal key provisions. Missouri voters approved the Legislature’s revisions in 2020, before the original plan was ever used. Independent commissions approved by Colorado and Michigan voters remained in place and were used after the 2020 census.

The redistricting measures aren’t the only instances where state lawmakers have altered voter-approved measures.

Earlier this year, Missouri lawmakers repealed a paid sick leave law passed by voters and referred a proposed repeal of an abortion rights amendment to the ballot. In South Dakota, voters approved a public campaign finance system, tightened lobbying laws and created an ethics commission in 2016. Lawmakers repealed and replaced the measure the next year with a narrower government watchdog board and looser limits on lobbyist gifts to public officials.

Associated Press writer David Lieb contributed from Jefferson City, Missouri.

We’re not going anywhere.

Stand up for truly independent, trusted news that you can count on!




Source: Utah News