Utah News

Utah State head coach Jerrod Calhoun referred to his team’s performance against UNLV Thursday night as “a bit of a trainwreck.”

But despite their struggles, the Aggies are still on track to win a Mountain West tournament championship.

“I’m proud of our guys. Obviously, it’s the tournament and survive-and-advance time,” Calhoun proclaimed following USU’s 70-58 win over the Rebels in the quarterfinals of the conference tourney at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas. “I’ve been watching the games here at the Thomas & Mack, and nobody is really scoring the basketball. So, it’s either really bad offenses or really good defenses.

“But were a bit of a trainwreck tonight with 12 assists and 15 turnovers; that’s uncharacteristic of our group. But as I told our group, I was proud of the fact that we were plus-4 on the glass and imposed our will.”

Graduate guard Ian Martinez (17 points) and sophomore guard Mason Falslev (15 points) led the way offensively for Utah State, which pulled out the win despite committing 27 fouls, having two players foul out and three others finish the game with four fouls.

“You know, it’s hard, especially when we think we’re keeping our hands up,” Falslev said of the significant foul discrepancy. “But I mean, that was their whole game plan was to isolate us and attack us and get to the free-throw line, and they did a good job of that. And you know, we’ve got to do better at not fouling.”

The Rebels, who were called for 16 total fouls, ended up knocking down 29 of 37 free-throw attempts. That played a big role in the game considering UNLV (18-15) shot just 23.6% on their home floor, including a 3-for-20 performance from 3-point range.

Conversely, the Aggies were just 12 of 17 from the free-throw line, but they shot 46.3% from the field and knocked down 8 of their 25 3-point attempts.

Sophomore forward Karson Templin contributed nine points and six rebounds for the Aggies, despite playing just 17 minutes due to foul trouble. And Tucker Anderson equaled Martinez with a team-high three 3-pointers, but he also had foul issues and logged only 16 minutes.

The Aggies, who led by as many as 11 points early in the game, surrendered a 17-3 run to the Rebels later in the first half that left them briefly trailing by three points. Utah State steadied the ship over the final six minutes, however, and closed the half out with a 17-7 burst to take a 36-29 advantage into halftime.

The contest was a grind in the second half due to the Aggies committing 16 fouls and turning the ball over 10 times, but the Rebels still never managed to get closer than four points the remainder of the game.

Junior guard Jaden Henley led UNLV with 19 points thanks to an 11-for-12 effort from the free-throw line, while forward Jalen Hill and guard Jailen Bedford both finished with 13 points. The Rebels played just seven men Thursday due to a recent rash of injuries that sidelined, most notably, leading scorer Dedan Thomas Jr. and graduate guard Julian Rishwain in recent weeks.

“What an awesome fight,” UNLV head coach Kevin Kruger declared. “I mean, what an awesome 40-minute fight by our guys. Obviously, we came up a little bit short, but going into a Utah State matchup, you know you’re going to have to play incredibly hard for 40 minutes because of how hard they play and how together they play.

“And with some of the mileage that we’ve asked the guys to put on their legs over the last couple of weeks, I thought it was just an absolutely awesome fight by our guys to compete and really do everything in their power to have a chance to win a ballgame against a really good team.”

The third-seeded Aggies (24-6) will now face No. 2 Colorado State (23-9) in the second game of the semifinals at 10 p.m. Friday. The Rams advanced courtesy of a 67-59 victory over No. 7 Nevada on Thursday. Senior guard Nique Clifford led the way for the Rams scoring a game-high 25 points and snaring a game-best 14 rebounds in 37 minutes.

“We need two out of our five starters to step up for tomorrow because you Coach (Niko) Medved’s group is playing really well – they really are,” said Calhoun, who suffered a brutal, 93-66 loss at Colorado State on March 1. “I’ve told NBA guys, ‘You guys are absolutely crazy if you don’t take Nique Clifford in the first round.’ I think he’s that good. He’s really, really good player.

“They’ve won eight in a row … and they’re humming. Their offense is humming, and where they don’t get enough credit is for their defense, so our offense has got to be much better if we’re going to win the game.”

Top-seeded New Mexico eliminated No. 8 San Jose State with a 63-52 win in the first game of the tournament on Thursday, while No. 5 Boise State knocked out No. 4 San Diego State with a 62-52 victory. The Lobos (26-6) will take on the Broncos (23-9) at 7:30 p.m. MT Friday.

Utah and Wyoming could benefit greatly in jobs, ratepayer benefits and environmental well-being if the two states pushed back on the proposals of new resource planning so PacifiCorp could embrace renewable energy in favor of fossil fuels.

A report commissioned by the Sierra Club looked at impacts of the two states they say could save money if PacifiCorp ramped up their pursuit of renewable energy instead of hanging onto coal-fired power plants and natural gas.

On Wednesday, the Sierra Club, in partnership with Current Energy Group, published a new report, Utah and Wyoming: Economic Opportunities in PacifiCorp’s Renewable Energy Transition, that provides a detailed analysis of how investments in renewable energy could create thousands of long-term, good paying jobs while boosting economic activity and generating critical tax revenue for communities in both states.

The report comes as PacifiCorp, the region’s largest electric utility, has admittedly dialed back on clean energy investments and delaying coal plant closures until their end of life instead of accelerated retirement unless based on regulatory mandates, they say.

Instead, the plan is hyper focused on the completion of high voltage lines that serve multiple states and investing in improving the grid.

The plan, however, under review by utility regulators, emphasizes:

• 6,379 megawatts of new wind resources.
• 7,668 megawatts of storage resources, including four-hour, eight-hour, and 100-hour durations.
• 5,492 megawatts of new solar resources.
• 500 megawatts of advanced nuclear via the NatriumTM reactor demonstration project.

Dave Eskelsen, spokesman for Rocky Mountain Power and PacifiCorp said the draft 2025 plan is a roadmap for continual progress in providing “safe, reliable electric service at fair and reasonable prices” to over two million customers in six Western states, half of which are in Utah.

“The conclusions in the (plan) are driven in large measure by PacifiCorp’s obligation to implement the energy policies of the states we serve. The exhaustive analysis conducted by the year-long public process includes analysis of costs to customers, as well as an evaluation of system reliability to support our responsibility to provide an essential public service,” he said. “The plan is focused on the least-cost, least-risk portfolio of resource types that are in the best interests of customers.”

The draft plan is just that. The final plan is due March 31 with state utility commissions.

Yet, critics assert at the same time, recent legislative efforts in Utah and Wyoming have continued to favor fossil fuels, prioritizing what they say are outdated energy sources over the clear economic benefits of renewable energy.

“PacifiCorp has long prioritized outdated, costly coal plants over clean energy solutions, despite overwhelming evidence that renewable energy is the better economic choice,” said Rose Monahan, staff attorney for the Sierra Club.

“Sierra Club has long pushed the utility to evaluate the true cost of its coal fleet, and results have consistently shown that much if not all of PacifiCorp’s coal resources are unnecessarily expensive for customers. This report makes clear that Utah and Wyoming have a tremendous opportunity by embracing a clean energy future.”

Key findings include:

• Investing in renewable energy in Utah and Wyoming would create thousands of new jobs, with workers in clean energy projected to earn significantly higher salaries than current state averages.
• The high renewables scenario analyzed in the report would generate 18,247 more job-years than a low-renewables approach.
• Increased renewable energy investments would drive billions in economic growth and provide critical tax revenue to support public services such as schools and hospitals, more than offsetting lost revenue from fossil fuel retirements.

“In Utah, we’ve been consistently told that transitioning away from coal would devastate our rural communities, but this report reveals a different reality,” said Luis Miranda, Utah-based Campaign Organizer for the Sierra Club. “The data confirms that a shift to renewable energy isn’t just necessary — it’s an economic opportunity. The only question that remains is whether Utah’s leaders and utilities will act on this opportunity or leave workers and communities behind.”

Miranda said he has met countless members and officials of Emery and Carbon counties entrenched in the coal mining industry that is in a state of flux.

“We’ve long been told that transitioning away from coal will devastate our rural communities, but the study conducted by the current energy group reveals a different story. It shows how a shift to renewable energy is, in fact, an economic opportunity for Utah,” Miranda said.

“I’ve spoken with families of workers who have powered our state for generations, and I’ve seen firsthand the economic uncertainty brought by the coal industry. And let me be clear, I can’t help but feel so proud for the legacy of generations of Utahns, of coal miners and coal plant workers who have sacrificed so much to ensure the lights stay on in this country, who love the land that they live in, and who will break their backs to support their families” Miranda said.

But Miranda said it is not so much a matter of jobs, but long-term stability.

”People want to know, will there be careers that will allow them to stay in their communities, buy a home, provide for their families and plan for the future. In fact, one phrase that has become too common in coal country has been that their greatest export is their children, who often leave because they are unsure about the future economic opportunities offered by coal jobs.”

That sentiment was echoed by another presenter.

“Our state’s most important export today isn’t coal or natural gas — it’s jobs,” said Emma Jones, climate and energy organizer for the Sierra Club in Wyoming.

But is Utah embracing solar?

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Utah has not been sitting quietly by to ignore its solar resources.

“With a high ultraviolet index, due to our relatively high altitude, and investment in solar photovoltaic systems, Utah was ranked ninth in the U.S. for solar energy generating capacity,” it said.

Earlier this month, Senators John Curtis, R-Utah, and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., introduced the Co-Location Energy Act, bipartisan legislation that seeks to unlock renewable energy potential. By allowing wind and solar projects to be co-located on existing federal energy leases, the Co-Location Energy Act provides a streamlined framework for developers to evaluate and build projects on already-disturbed federal lands with the consent of the current leaseholder.

”Innovation and efficiency are key as we work to meet energy demands and reduce emissions,” Curtis said. “The Co-Location Energy Act is a commonsense approach that leverages already-leased federal lands for renewable energy development. By expediting permitting and ensuring that previously disturbed areas are fully utilized, this bill strengthens energy supply to the grid without compromising existing operations.”

Added Hickenlooper: ”Our clean energy future is here. We need to meet it. Our bipartisan bill will cut unnecessary red tape to speed our energy production and bring more wind and solar projects online quicker.”

This week, Clearway Energy Group announced that it closed financing and began construction on its Honeycomb portfolio, which comprises of four battery energy storage systems projects adjacent to an operating solar energy portfolio owned and operated by Clearway.

Each 80-megawatt project will use four-hour Tesla batteries and collectively store up to 1,280 megawatts of dispatchable power. Honeycomb is contracted with PacifiCorp under a 20-year agreement that makes use of existing solar plants in Beaver and Iron counties.

But are Utah, Wyoming doing enough?

The analysis says no.

“Based on this analysis, CEG found that the economic impacts from investment in the high renewable plans led to greater overall job creation. In total, the high renewables case is expected to generate 18,247 more job-years compared to the low renewables case, with the UT/WY-focused plan to generate 34,999 more job years. In both cases, the majority of these gains come from additional solar capacity,” according to the report.

Notably, it said these values reflect the total net impact of the higher renewable plans, including job losses from earlier thermal retirements.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told lawmakers in a congressional hearing last January that it didn’t make sense for his platforms to verify how old their users are in order to serve them age-appropriate experiences. Instead, that responsibility should lie with app stores, he said.

Just over a year later, one state has taken his advice.

Utah passed a first-of-its-kind bill last week requiring app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent before minors could download apps to their devices.

The bill, which is awaiting Utah Governor Spencer Cox’s signature, marks a win for Zuckerberg and other platform operators, who have faced mounting pressure to make a bigger effort to protect children and teens online. And it could lead to a major shift in how all users – not just young people – interact with app stores. At least eight other states have introduced similar bills.

But the bill is already facing pushback from Apple and Google, as well as other critics who say it raises privacy and First Amendment concerns.

“While only a fraction of apps on the App Store may require age verification, all users would have to hand over their sensitive personally identifying information to us — regardless of whether they actually want to use one of these limited set of apps,” Apple, which has long made privacy central to its brand, said in a report published last week. “That’s not in the interest of user safety or privacy.”

In a blog post published Wednesday, Google’s director of government affairs and public policy, Kareem Ghanem, criticized what he called “fast-moving legislative proposals being pushed by Meta and other companies in an effort to offload their own responsibilities to keep kids safe to app stores.”

“These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors, without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act,” Ghanem said.

Both Apple and Google have suggested alternative proposals that would involve a shared responsibility for age verification between app stores and app developers. They’re also pushing for privacy-protected age data to be shared only with the platforms that need it.

Google this week sent a veto request to Utah’s governor over the bill, along with bill text of its proposal, Google spokesperson Danielle Cohen told CNN.

One-stop-shop for age verification

For proponents of legislation like the Utah bill, the idea is relatively simple: make app stores a sort of central clearinghouse for age verification that all apps can rely on to ensure they’re not exposing young people to potentially harmful or inappropriate content.

“I don’t think that parents should have to upload an ID or prove that they’re the parent of a child in every single app that their children use,” Zuckerberg told the Senate Judiciary Committee during last year’s hearing. “I think the right place to do this, and a place where it would be actually very easy for it to work, is within the app stores themselves.”

This type of law would take the pressure off companies like Meta — which has faced years of fierce criticism for exposing young users to harms such as sexual harassment and eating disorder content — to verify users’ ages and potentially collect sensitive information in the process. Even as Meta has rolled out a growing slate of teen safety features, critics have said that young people could evade them by signing up for accounts with inaccurate birthdates. Some critics also say such tools put too great a burden on parents to monitor their kids’ app usage on an ongoing basis.

Utah’s App Store Accountability Act is aimed at curbing this issue. If signed into law, app store operators would be required to identify a users’ “age category” — either an under-13 “child,” a 13- to 16-year-old “young teenager,” a 16- to 18-year-old “older teenager” or an 18-and-over “adult” — and share it with app developers, while protecting the data used to verify it.

Under the law, a minor’s account would have to be linked to a parent’s account, and the app store would have to seek parental consent before the minor could download an app or make in-app purchases. The law would be enforced starting next year.

So, in theory, a parent could simply turn down their teen’s request to download Instagram or another social media app if the parental oversight tools feel insufficient or too complex.

The day the Utah bill passed, Meta, Snap and X released a joint statement applauding the legislation that said, “Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their child’s age and grant permission for them to download apps in a privacy-preserving way.”

Cox, Utah’s Republican governor, posted on X last week that his office would be reviewing the bill, which he said provides “a more streamlined and privacy-conscious solution for families.” Cox’s office did not respond to a request for comment from CNN about whether he plans to sign the bill into law.

An imperfect solution

However, critics of the bill say it could raise both legal and practical questions.

For example, what happens if families have a device that both children and adults use? Whose age should the app store verify?

What about young people with complex family situations for whom it may not be straightforward to get parental approval for each app download, even for benign apps like those used for educational purposes?

And how will app stores implement the age verification requirements in just one state? What if users travel or use virtual private networks to hide their locations?

But privacy is at the core of concerns regarding such proposals. Although the Utah law is designed so that users wouldn’t have to hand over information to verify their age across multiple platforms, they’d still need to provide personal data — likely a government ID or a scan of their face — to verify their age via the app stores. And it wouldn’t just apply to children, but to anyone who uses the app store, regardless of what apps they want to access.

“This level of data sharing isn’t necessary — a weather app doesn’t need to know if a user is a kid,” Google’s Ghanem wrote in his Wednesday post.

And it’s not just the app stores expressing that concern.

“At this moment when there is legitimate concern about the vast amounts of information that people freely hand over to social media companies, app stores, devices and other services, why are we as a legislative matter requiring them to collect more information, right?” said Aaron Mackey, free speech and transparency litigation director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The Utah law does not specify the method app stores would need to use for age verification. But the use of AI and facial recognition could run the risk of misidentifying users ages.

“A lot of these age assurance technologies that sort of guess your age can be wrong in both false positive and false negatives,” Mackey said. “If you are a 40-year-old who happens to have a younger face, you could be misclassified as a minor.”

Kerry Maeve Sheehan, director of legal advocacy for the tech industry-backed advocacy group Chamber of Progress, wrote in a blog post last week that the Utah law could run afoul of the First Amendment by forcing adults to choose between handing over personal information or accessing “legally protected online speech.” Likewise, minors would be forced to get parental consent before accessing protected online speech.

Last year, a federal judge blocked a separate but similar Utah law that required social media companies to verify users’ ages on First Amendment grounds.

And while such laws are being lauded by platform operators like Zuckerberg, it wouldn’t take them entirely off the hook, according to Jane Horvath, partner at the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and former Apple chief privacy officer.

For example, she said, it could force app developers to grapple with the fact that they may already have children under the age of 13 on their platforms that they weren’t aware of. That could mean they’re violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, which prohibits online platforms from collecting data on children under the age of 13 without parental consent — a problem platforms would need to swiftly address.

“Once app stores start sending a signal to apps, they will have actual knowledge that they have children on their platform, and they’ll either have to delete their accounts, block them” or find another way to comply with the law, Horvath said.

Despite the concerns, many parents and online safety experts say something needs to be done to protect young people online.

Lawmakers like Utah’s governor may simply be doing “the best they can with the tools they have as a policymaker,” said Kris Perry, executive director of the research organization Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development.

“It’s pretty much universally accepted that kids are not doing well with this much exposure,” Perry said.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

A Utah data center has secured a $2 billion investment — the second largest of its kind — to build the remainder of its West Jordan campus.

When it’s done, Novva’s 100-acre campus will be “one of the largest superclusters” of servers in the United States, said CEO Wes Swenson, powering 175 megawatts to data servers around the world.

Novva built the first stage of its Utah campus in 2020 and the $2 billion investment from JPMorgan Chase and Starwood Property Group will help the company finish the two remaining buildings, Swensen said.

It also is the second $2 billion loan awarded to a data center this year, according to reporting from The Wall Street Journal. Most data construction loans before January were less than $1 billion. Swenson said he is glad this investment is happening in Utah.

“I have a super high conviction to the Utah market, our employees and community,” said Swenson, who lives in Utah County.

Utah is high …

Utah is well positioned to house massive data centers like Novva, the chief executive said. Up at altitude — Novva sits at roughly 4,000 feet above sea level — the air is cooler. Data centers need to keep servers cool. Most use evaporative cooling to keep temperatures low — Novva can literally pull from the air to cool its cooling liquid most of the year, Swenson said.

The Beehive State also doesn’t have to worry about intense natural disasters, Swenson said — though he does have a precise seismograph to monitor for any earthquake activity.

There are 39 data centers in Utah, according to the Data Center Map. Twenty-six of them are in the Salt Lake metro area.

Utah’s business-friendly ecosystem also helps incentivize data centers in the state, said Jim Buie, CEO of ValorC3 Data Centers (formerly Tonaquint). Valor has been around since 2008 and has capitalized on Utah’s “good growth trajectory” — tax incentives, low-cost power and fiber optic connectivity.

“Those are all wonderful ingredients for not just tech, but certainly the data center business,” Buie said.

… and dry

The need for data centers has exploded in recent years as AI has become an everyday tool for internet users. The amount of new data center construction in the top eight markets more than doubled in 2024 compared to the year prior, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Buie said he and other industry analysts expect generation to quadruple over the next four years — “both the quantity [of centers] and the amount of power that data centers use.” If Utah can keep up with the electricity demand — a big focus in the legislative session and Gov. Spencer Cox’s budget this year — it’s poised to lead the nation in “driving the digital economy,” Buie said.

But one of Utah’s scarcest resources is also the most critical to many data centers: water.

Most centers cool their servers through evaporative cooling, which can use millions of gallons of water each month.

Novva uses coolant, not water, to cool its servers, Swenson said — meaning that roughly 100,000 gallons of the campus’s million-gallon annual water consumption are used in Novva’s closed-loop cooling system. The remaining 90%, he said, is for plumbing, like toilets, sinks, and drinking fountains.

“It’s equal to about three homes annually,” Swenson said. “We’re considered a zero-water footprint.”

Not all centers are so water-conscious, Buie said, although they will likely have to be in order to succeed. Valor also uses a closed-loop cooling system, Buie said, which saves water from evaporation.

Novva’s brand-new campus buildings should both be done by mid-2026, Swenson said. The servers that will fill them are already leased.

“They have to be built somewhere,” Swenson said of large data centers. “This is as good a place as any as long as we’re good stewards.”

Shannon Sollitt is a Report for America corps member covering business accountability and sustainability for The Salt Lake Tribune. Your donation to match our RFA grant helps keep her writing stories like this one; please consider making a tax-deductible gift of any amount today by clicking here.

Utah Attorney General Derek Brown announced this week that 11 contractors with signature gathering companies are facing “forgery and forgery-related charges.”

The allegedly forged signatures were largely captured during the signature verification process, charging documents said, and were not included in the counted signatures that allowed candidates to qualify for the ballot.

The individuals charged collected signatures in five of Utah’s 29 counties — Iron, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Washington. Approximately five of the contractors worked with Gathering, Inc., also known as Gather, and the others’ employers were not listed on charging documents.

All 11, according to the charging documents, collected signatures during the 2024 primary election cycle.

Nearly 60 candidates in Utah contests — from the gubernatorial race, to congressional races, to state legislative races — submitted signature petitions for verification last election cycle. In Utah, candidates can either qualify for the ballot by gathering a certain number of signatures from members of their party, the volume varying by the office, or being chosen by party delegates.

Gather owner Tanner Leatham estimated five to six campaigns that used his company’s services were impacted.

Among Gather’s customers is Gov. Spencer Cox, whose campaign spent $147,000 on signature gathering, according to financial disclosures.

The newly elected Brown also used a signature petition to qualify for the primary ballot, although he worked with a company called In the Field.

According to charging documents, one contractor admitted to signing some voters’ signatures without their permission “so he could make more money.” Charged contractors frequently had spouses or other family members sign for an individual, something one contractor told an investigator he did to “kill two birds with one stone.”

Leatham said all of Gather’s contractors were trained on Utah’s laws around signature gathering, and the company will continue to provide that training for the hundreds of contractors it hires each election cycle. The short-term job can be difficult, Leatham noted, because it requires going door-to-door in the winter.

“When individuals choose to break the rules we do everything we can to help the state go after these people,” Leatham said in a statement, adding, “These individuals made poor and dishonest choices, completely ignoring the law and their training.”

A statement from the attorney general said the cases were referred to his office by the elections office under Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, the state auditor’s office and the Washington County clerk’s office.

Utah Auditor Tina Cannon said in a statement Tuesday her office has “been involved in a joint effort with the lieutenant governor’s office related to signature gathering during the 2024 election cycle.”

Last year, the attorney general’s office charged 13 men with falsifying signatures on petitions for Republican candidate Bruce Hough in the 2023 special election to replace retiring Rep. Chris Stewart. Nine of the defendants entered into pleas in abeyance and paid a fine. One plead guilty and was sentenced to three years probation. Two had the charges dismissed. One case remains pending.

Brown’s announcement came days after the end of Utah’s annual legislative session, during which lawmakers passed multiple bills meant to increase transparency around the verification of signatures on candidate petitions.

Sen. Wayne Harper’s SB164 allows poll watchers to observe the signature verification process, mandates an audit of signature comparisons and requires election officers to certify a certain percentage of signatures beyond the threshold. Another, SB53 from Sen. Calvin Musselman, R-West Haven, establishes a process for voters to remove their name from a candidate nomination petition.

From Leatham’s perspective, cases like these show why lawmakers should also reconsider the signature threshold set for candidates — lowering it would limit the reliance on contractors to qualify for the ballot.

In statewide races, candidates have to collect and have verified 28,000 signatures — over a thousand more than the entire population of Farmington.

“It is too difficult and too expensive as it is right now,” Leatham wrote in an email. “Lowering the threshold of signatures will make it easier for candidates to use friends, family and volunteers to collect signatures. We need more candidates on the ballot not less, too many races go uncontested year after year.”

Salt Lake Tribune reporter Robert Gehrke contributed to this report.